![Supreme Court allows retrospective application of the amended S.29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Supreme-Court-allows-retrospective-application-of-the-amended-S.29-A-of-the-Arbitration-and-Conciliation-Act-1996-600x324.jpg)
Supreme Court allows retrospective application of the amended S.29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“the SC”) in the matter of Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Tata Sons Ltd.) versus Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd. & Ors. settles law on retrospective applicability of amended S.29A of
![quantum of interest in a contract](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/quantum-of-interest-in-a-contract-blog-600x324.jpg)
In absence of an explicit clause on quantum of interest in a contract, compound interest cannot be awarded: Delhi High Court
In the case of M/s. Modi Construction Company vs. Ircon International Limited[1], the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi (“the Court”) while dealing with appeal filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
![Assignee can invoke arbitration clause Bombay High Court](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Assignee-can-invoke-arbitration-clause-Bombay-High-Court.jpg)
Assignee, having stepped into the shoes of the assignor, can invoke arbitration clause: Bombay High Court.
In a recent order,in the matter of M/s. Siemens Factoring Private Limited v. Future Enterprises Private Limited[1]the Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“the Court”) held that an assignee, though not a party but having stepped into
![Arbitrators fees Under The Fourth Schedule Of A and C Act](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Arbitrators-fees-Under-The-Fourth-Schedule-Of-AampC-Act-scaled.jpg)
Supreme Court Clarifies The Law On Payment Of Fees To Arbitrators
The Hon’ble Supreme Court (the SC) in Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. Afcons Gunanusa JV[1] settled law on applicability of the Fourth Schedule (“the Schedule”) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the
![](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/19060165_1391425387571857_5252963044412178685_n.jpg)
Delhi High Court reiterates its findings on what constitutes non est filing for the purposes of calculating period of limitation.
Introduction The High Court of Delhi, in a recent judgement re-iterated the concept of non-est filing in Ambrosia Corner House Private Limited V. Hangro S Foods1. The Court laid out instances that would constitute non-est
![Bombay High Court](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Untitled.jpg)
Once the reference under MSMED Act is filed, it would override invocation of arbitration by other party: Bombay High court
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in a recent order passed on 24th January 2023 has ruled that the ongoing dispute filed under the provision of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act,
- Arbitration and Conciliation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy Code – Public Announcements
- Civil
- Commercial litigation
- Commercial/Corporate
- Criminal
- Cyber Law
- Debt Recovery
- Food
- IL News
- Infrastructure
- Insolvency & Bankruptcy
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International
- Labour
- Law
- Medico-Legal
- Negotiable Instrument
- NRI Laws
- Policy
- Power
- Real Estate
- Tax