Supreme Court Limits Judicial Interference US 11(5); Referral Courts Must Avoid Dvelving Into Merits Of Dispute

Supreme Court Limits Judicial Interference U/S 11(5); Referral Courts Must Avoid Dvelving Into Merits Of Dispute

On 7th November, 2024 the Supreme Court in the case of Goqii Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Sokrati Technologies Pvt. Ltd. set aside an order of the High Court of Bombay involving a petition under Section

Section 11 Arbitration Application After Unconditional Withdrawal

Supreme Court Bars Fresh Filing Of Section 11 Arbitration Application After Unconditional Withdrawal

Introduction The Hon’ble Supreme Court recently in M/s. HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. vs M/s. Shahaji Bhanudas Bhad held that Order 23 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code (“CPC”) applies to applications for the appointment of

nilateral Appointment of Arbitrators by Public Sector Undertakings

Supreme Court Ruling on the Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators by Public Sector Undertakings

Introduction The Supreme Court of India delivered the much-awaited judgment dealing with the arbitration clauses that deals with the unilateral appointment of the Arbitrators by Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). On 8th November 2024 the Constitution

Plaintiff Need Not Pray to Set Aside Sale Deed with Prior Knowledge

Arbitration in Retreat? The Government’s Memorandum and its Challenges

The Government of India through the Ministry of Finance vide its memorandum dated 3rd June 2024(hereinafter referred to as “Memo”) on Arbitration and Mediation in Public Procurement Contracts has sent shockwaves across the legal fraternity

Accountability Of Advocate’s Services Vis-A -Vis Liability Under Consumer Protection Act: Supreme Court

Accountability Of Advocate’s Services Vis-A -Vis Liability Under Consumer Protection Act: Supreme Court

The Hon’ble Apex Court in the matter of Bar of Indian Lawyers Through its President Jasbir Sigh Malik vs D.K Gandhi PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases[1] overruled a 2007 judgement of the National Consumer

Time-barred Claim Rejection Unfair in Ongoing Communication Calcutta HC

It is unfair to reject a claim on the grounds that it is time-barred when the parties are in constant communication: Calcutta High Court

Introduction: In the case of Tree House Education and Accessories Ltd. versus Holy Trust School, the single bench of High Court of Calcutta was approached under Section 11 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10