Court Can Act u/s 9 Arbitration Act Despite Unstamped Agreement: Bombay HC

Court Can Exercise Power u/s 9 of Arbitration Act Even if Arbitration Agreement is Not Duly Stamped: Bombay High Court

Friday December 8, 2023. BY Shivangi Dubey & Aaushi Doshi | Arbitration and Conciliation

The Bombay High Court (“HC”) in L&T Finance Limited v. Diamond Projects Limited and 4 Other Petitions held that under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (“Act”) there is no need to determine

Group of Companies Doctrine Applies to Indian Jurisprudence; Can Also Bind non-signatories to Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court

Group of Companies Doctrine Applies to Indian Jurisprudence; Can Also Bind non-signatories to Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court

Friday December 8, 2023. BY Aaushi Doshi & Shivangi Dubey | Arbitration and Conciliation

A Constitution Bench comprising of Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud (CJI), Justice Hrishikesh Roy, Justice Pamidighantam, Sri Narasimha, Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra, of the Supreme Court (“SC”) held in the case of Cox

Unfold Nuances of Section 9 of Arbitration Act: A Case Study of Vivek Jain v. PrepLadder Pvt. Ltd., Delhi High Court 

Unfold Nuances of Section 9 of Arbitration Act: A Case Study of Vivek Jain v. PrepLadder Pvt. Ltd., Delhi High Court 

Friday November 10, 2023. BY Shivangi Dubey and Tannya Baranwal | Arbitration and Conciliation

It was interpreted by the Delhi High Court that the Court exercising its powers under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996(‘Arbitration Act’) to secure the amount in dispute or to order attachment

Court Adjudicating Upon Arbitration Award u/s 34 Holds Power to Recalculate Compensation Granted Under NHAI Act: Allahabad High Court

Court Adjudicating Upon Arbitration Award u/s 34 Holds Power to Recalculate Compensation Granted Under NHAI Act: Allahabad High Court

Wednesday November 8, 2023. BY Shivangi Dubey and Aaushi Doshi | Arbitration and Conciliation

Introduction The High Court of Allahabad (“the HC”) in the case of Chandra Kishori (“A1”) v. Union of India Thru. Chairman Of National Highway Authority of India and 2 Others; and  Om Prakash (“A2”) v.

Sanctioning Profit loss Claim Without Proof Conflicts with Indian Policy

Sanctioning Claim for Loss of Profit in Absence of Substantial Proof Is in Conflict with Public Policy of India: Apex Court

Friday November 3, 2023. BY Shivangi Dubey & Aaushi Doshi. | Arbitration and Conciliation

Introduction In the context of interpreting an award deemed to be patently illegal and conflicting with public policy, the Supreme Court in M/s. Unibros v. All India Radio[1], clarified that a claim for loss of

The Non – Non-Arbitrability of Consumer Disputes

The Non – Arbitrability of Consumer Disputes

Monday October 30, 2023. BY Brian Noronha | Arbitration and Conciliation

In a recent decision[i], the Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) has reiterated its stand on the non – arbitrability of consumer disputes under the present Indian dispute resolution regime. In doing so, the SC rejected an

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10