Tag: Bombay High Court
![The Applicable Custom Duty Shall Be The One Which Was In Force When The Bills Of Entry Are Presented](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/The-Applicable-Custom-Duty-Shall-Be-The-One-Which-Was-In-Force-When-The-Bills-Of-Entry-Are-Presented-600x324.png)
The Applicable Custom Duty Shall Be The One Which Was In Force When The Bills Of Entry Are Presented
In a recent ruling, a Division Bench of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court comprising of Hon’ble Justice K.R. Shriram and Justice Jitendra Jain clarified a crucial aspect of customs law, specifically the time when the
![Maharashtra Stamp Act Refund of Stamp Duty Cannots Be Denied on Mere Technical Grounds](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Maharashtra-Stamp-Act-Refund-of-Stamp-Duty-Cannots-Be-Denied-on-Mere-Technical-Grounds-600x324.png)
Maharashtra Stamp Act | Refund of Stamp Duty Cannot Be Denied on Mere Technical Grounds
The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”), in a recent decision[i], upheld and relayed an observation made in its earlier decision of Committee-GFIL v. Libra Buildtech Private Limited & Ors.[ii], wherein the Hon’ble SC observed that: “19.
![Bombay High Court](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/BOMBAY-HIGH-COURT-HOLDS-THAT-EMPLOYEES-CANNOT-SUBSEQUENTLY-CHALLENGE-THEIR-PROMOTION-AFTER-ACCEPTING-THE-SAME-WITHOUT-DEMUR-600x324.png)
Bombay High Court Holds That Employees Cannot Subsequently Challenge Their Promotion After Accepting The Same Without Demur
In a recent judgment, passed in the matter of Shri Shripad Dwarkanath Gupte and Ors. v. Union of India[1] the Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“HC”) elucidated that employees who have accepted promotions based on grades,
![Upholding Plaints Seeking Urgent Relief Without Pre-Institution Mediation Barriers](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Upholding-Plaints-Seeking-Urgent-Relief-Without-Pre-Institution-Mediation-Barriers-600x324.jpg)
Upholding Plaints Seeking Urgent Relief Without Pre-Institution Mediation Barriers
In a recent judgement[i], the Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“HC”), dismissed an application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (“CPC”), by Chemco Plast (“Defendant”) seeking rejection of a trademark
![Strict Scrutiny Standard to be adopted for Deceptively Similar Trademarks in Pharmaceutical Product Sector](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Adopt-Strict-Scrutiny-for-Deceptively-Similar-Pharma-Trademarks-600x324.png)
Strict Scrutiny Standard to be adopted for Deceptively Similar Trademarks in Pharmaceutical Product Sector
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“HC”) recently held[i] that a trademark cannot be granted, by holding that structurally & phonetically similar trademark ought not to be registered for a drug of similar aliment, having a
- Arbitration and Conciliation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy Code – Public Announcements
- Civil
- Commercial litigation
- Commercial/Corporate
- Criminal
- Cyber Law
- Debt Recovery
- Food
- IL News
- Infrastructure
- Insolvency & Bankruptcy
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International
- Labour
- Law
- Medico-Legal
- Negotiable Instrument
- NRI Laws
- Policy
- Power
- Real Estate
- Tax