Insights

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
January 18, 2023

DISPUTES REGARDING NON-PAYMENT OF DUES CANNOT BE REFERRED TO ARBITRATION AS IT IS SIMPLY A CASE OF RECOVERY: PUNJAB AND HARYANA HC →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
January 18, 2023

SUPREME COURT OBSERVES: BURDEN LIES ON THE BORROWER TO PROVE THAT THE SECURED PROPERTIES ARE AGRICULTURAL LANDS →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
January 11, 2023

SARFAESI Act Prevails Over MSMED Act: Supreme Court →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
January 11, 2023

ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY HAS NO JURISDICTION TO MODIFY A RESOLUTION PLAN: NCLAT →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
January 4, 2023

HC: Section 47 of CPC Cannot Be Applicable While Executing Arbitral Awards States Tripura High Court →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
December 28, 2022

IBC: AN ASSIGNEE IS a financial creditor under ibc and can continue CONTINUING PROCEEDINGS initiated under SECTION 7 by the assignor – nclat →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
December 20, 2022

Mandatory for Bank to inform all auction participants about encumbrances on Property to be auctioned →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
December 14, 2022

Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would apply to International Commercial Arbitration, where the place of Arbitration is outside India: States Calcutta High Court →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
December 7, 2022

PENDENCY OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SARFAESI ACT DOES NOT BAR INITIATION OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS STATES DELHI HC →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
December 1, 2022

Impact of Provident Fund Dues on Approval of Resolution Plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
November 23, 2022

THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN THE WORK ORDERS/CONSULTING AGREEMENTS WOULD NOT BE BINDING IF MOU, BEING BASE OF THE CLAIM DOES NOT INCLUDE AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE: STATES PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT →

November 21, 2022

IN CASE OF FAILURE TO DISCLOSE THE EXCLUSION CLAUSES TO THE INSURED AS PER IRDA REGULATIONS, THE INSURER WON’T BE ABLE TO REPUDIATE THE CONTRACT: STATES SC →