![Supreme Court Reaffirms Rainbow Papers Case Law, Dismisses Review Petition](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Supreme-Court-Reaffirms-Rainbow-Papers-Case-Law-Dismisses-Review-Petition-600x324.png)
Supreme Court Re-Affirms The Law Laid Down In The Case Of Rainbow Papers By Dismissing Review Petition
Introduction The recent judgment of the Supreme Court comes as a major drawback to lenders as the Court dismissed the Review Petitions filed by the Lenders seeking review of earlier judgment passed by the Court.
![The SC Clarifies The Limitation Period For CIRP And Claim Lodging Based On DRT Recovery Certificate](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/The-SC-Clarifies-The-Limitation-Period-For-CIRP-And-Claim-Lodging-Based-On-DRT-Recovery-Certificate-600x324.png)
The SC Clarifies The Limitation Period For The Purposes Of Initiating CIRP And Lodging Claim During CIRP On The Basis Of A DRT Recovery Certificate As Financial Debt.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court (SC) in the case of Tottempudi Salalith Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.[1] has affirmed its previous judgments and held that a DRT Recovery Certificate holder shall have, from the
![](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/themes/Nextline_V5-main/images/default.jpg)
Auction Purchaser Is King: Supreme Court Upholds The Sanctity Of The Auction Process As Envisaged By The SARFAESI Act Over The Right To Redemption Of A Mortgagor
In a recent decision[i], the Hon’ble Supreme Court[ii] [“SC”] has declared that the auction procedure laid down in section 13 (8) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act,
![Liquidator Has No Absolute Discretion to Cancel a Valid Auction on a Mere Expectation of Fetching a Higher Price: Supreme Court of India](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Liquidator-Must-Justify-Auction-Cancellation-SC-600x324.png)
Liquidator Has No Absolute Discretion to Cancel a Valid Auction on a Mere Expectation of Fetching a Higher Price: Supreme Court of India
The Hon’ble Division Bench of the Supreme Court of India, comprising of Justice B. V. Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, in a recent appeal in the matter of Eva Agro Feeds Private Limited vs. Punjab
![Decision in Vidarbha Industries is the Exception not the Rule Supreme Court](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Decision-in-Vidarbha-Industries-is-the-Exception-not-the-Rule-Supreme-Court-600x324.png)
Decision in Vidarbha Industries is the Exception not the Rule: Supreme Court
A Division Bench of the Supreme Court, comprising of Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Rajesh Bindal in M. Suresh Kumar Reddy v. Canara Bank & Ors.[1] vide Judgement dated 11.05.2023, has held that once
![limitation in Operational Claims Supreme Court on Invoices](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/imitation-in-Operational-Claims-SC-on-Invoices-600x324.png)
In Operational Claims Arising Out Of Several Invoices, Those Invoices Falling Within The Three-Year Period Preceding The Date Of Filing Should Be Considered For The Purposes Of Limitation: Supreme Court
The Hon’ble Division Bench, Supreme Court of India, comprising of Justice Shri. Mukesh Kumar Rasikbhai Shah and Justice Shri C.T Ravikumar in the matter of M/s. Next Education India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. K12 Techno Services
- Arbitration and Conciliation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy Code – Public Announcements
- Civil
- Commercial litigation
- Commercial/Corporate
- Criminal
- Cyber Law
- Debt Recovery
- Food
- IL News
- Infrastructure
- Insolvency & Bankruptcy
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International
- Labour
- Law
- Medico-Legal
- Negotiable Instrument
- NRI Laws
- Policy
- Power
- Real Estate
- Tax