Aaushi Doshi
Ms. Aaushi Doshi is an Associate Partner at the Mumbai office of IndiaLaw LLP, where she heads the firm’s Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) practice, encompassing Arbitration, Conciliation, and Mediation. With over a decade of professional experience in commercial and civil litigation, she has appeared extensively before the Supreme Court of India, the Bombay High Court, and various judicial and quasi-judicial forums. Her practice is marked by a rigorous and methodical approach to legal advocacy, combined with a nuanced understanding of procedural and substantive law.
In her role as the head of the Arbitration Team, Ms. Doshi has represented clients in a diverse array of high-value domestic and international arbitrations. Her portfolio includes matters related to construction and infrastructure, banking and finance, insurance, media and entertainment, and commercial contract disputes. She has argued key matters under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, drafted a broad spectrum of litigation and arbitration documents, and conducted evidentiary hearings before arbitral tribunals. Her expertise spans the entire dispute lifecycle—from pre-dispute strategy and drafting to hearings and enforcement.
In addition to her litigation and arbitration expertise, Ms. Doshi is adept at legal drafting, contract negotiation, and regulatory advisory. She has co-authored a book on Cyber Law, served as an Arbitrator in Asia-Pacific Moots, and been invited as a judge and speaker by reputed institutions. Known for her clear communication, strong leadership, and analytical rigor, Ms. Doshi brings a holistic and solution-driven mindset to her practice, aligning legal outcomes with client goals.
Posts By Aaushi Doshi

PENDENCY OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SARFAESI ACT DOES NOT BAR INITIATION OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS STATES DELHI HC →

THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN THE WORK ORDERS/CONSULTING AGREEMENTS WOULD NOT BE BINDING IF MOU, BEING BASE OF THE CLAIM DOES NOT INCLUDE AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE: STATES PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT →

IN CASE OF FAILURE TO DISCLOSE THE EXCLUSION CLAUSES TO THE INSURED AS PER IRDA REGULATIONS, THE INSURER WON’T BE ABLE TO REPUDIATE THE CONTRACT: STATES SC →
