Aaushi Doshi
Ms. Aaushi Doshi is an Associate Partner at the Mumbai office of IndiaLaw LLP, where she heads the firm’s Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) practice, encompassing Arbitration, Conciliation, and Mediation. With over a decade of professional experience in commercial and civil litigation, she has appeared extensively before the Supreme Court of India, the Bombay High Court, and various judicial and quasi-judicial forums. Her practice is marked by a rigorous and methodical approach to legal advocacy, combined with a nuanced understanding of procedural and substantive law.
In her role as the head of the Arbitration Team, Ms. Doshi has represented clients in a diverse array of high-value domestic and international arbitrations. Her portfolio includes matters related to construction and infrastructure, banking and finance, insurance, media and entertainment, and commercial contract disputes. She has argued key matters under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, drafted a broad spectrum of litigation and arbitration documents, and conducted evidentiary hearings before arbitral tribunals. Her expertise spans the entire dispute lifecycle—from pre-dispute strategy and drafting to hearings and enforcement.
In addition to her litigation and arbitration expertise, Ms. Doshi is adept at legal drafting, contract negotiation, and regulatory advisory. She has co-authored a book on Cyber Law, served as an Arbitrator in Asia-Pacific Moots, and been invited as a judge and speaker by reputed institutions. Known for her clear communication, strong leadership, and analytical rigor, Ms. Doshi brings a holistic and solution-driven mindset to her practice, aligning legal outcomes with client goals.
Posts By Aaushi Doshi

Section 29A Inapplicable Where Arbitration Invoked Prior To 2015 Amendment: Delhi High Court In Partnership Property Dispute →

Supreme Court Reaffirms Equitable Powers Under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act: No Automatic Rescission for Delay in Deposit →

The Ghosts of Abandoned Suits: How the Supreme Court Used Ancient Latin Maxims to Deny Relief to Parties Who Played Fast and Loose with the Judicial Process →

Supreme Court Warns: Filing a Review Petition Does Not Excuse Non-Compliance with Court Orders →

Railway Catering License Renewals: A Settled Question Revisited As Delhi High Court Dismisses Fresh Challenge to Non-Renewal Policy Under Catering Policy 2017 →

Lost In Time: The Cruel Irony Of Justice In The Winter Olympics 2026 →

Reinterpreting The Due Diligence Proviso: Karnataka High Court On Order VI Rule 17 CPC →

Client Confidence On Trial: Advocate-Client Privilege And The Limits Of Judicial Compelled Disclosure →

Landmark Judgments in Arbitration (2025) →

Enforcing A 92-Year-Old Decree: The Supreme Court On Faith, Proof, And Possession →

Judicial Rationale in Sharad Singh v. H. D. Narang: A Significant Refinement in Compensation for a Paraplegic Victim →
