Insights

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
January 18, 2023

DISPUTES REGARDING NON-PAYMENT OF DUES CANNOT BE REFERRED TO ARBITRATION AS IT IS SIMPLY A CASE OF RECOVERY: PUNJAB AND HARYANA HC →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
January 18, 2023

SUPREME COURT OBSERVES: BURDEN LIES ON THE BORROWER TO PROVE THAT THE SECURED PROPERTIES ARE AGRICULTURAL LANDS →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
January 11, 2023

SARFAESI Act Prevails Over MSMED Act: Supreme Court →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
January 11, 2023

ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY HAS NO JURISDICTION TO MODIFY A RESOLUTION PLAN: NCLAT →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
January 4, 2023

HC: Section 47 of CPC Cannot Be Applicable While Executing Arbitral Awards States Tripura High Court →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
December 28, 2022

IBC: AN ASSIGNEE IS a financial creditor under ibc and can continue CONTINUING PROCEEDINGS initiated under SECTION 7 by the assignor – nclat →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
December 20, 2022

Mandatory for Bank to inform all auction participants about encumbrances on Property to be auctioned →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
December 14, 2022

Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would apply to International Commercial Arbitration, where the place of Arbitration is outside India: States Calcutta High Court →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
December 7, 2022

PENDENCY OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SARFAESI ACT DOES NOT BAR INITIATION OF ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS STATES DELHI HC →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
December 1, 2022

Impact of Provident Fund Dues on Approval of Resolution Plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 →

|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court
November 23, 2022

THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN THE WORK ORDERS/CONSULTING AGREEMENTS WOULD NOT BE BINDING IF MOU, BEING BASE OF THE CLAIM DOES NOT INCLUDE AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE: STATES PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT →

Supreme Court of India building representing insurance contract disclosure ruling
November 21, 2022

IN CASE OF FAILURE TO DISCLOSE THE EXCLUSION CLAUSES TO THE INSURED AS PER IRDA REGULATIONS, THE INSURER WON’T BE ABLE TO REPUDIATE THE CONTRACT: STATES SC →