Landmark Judgments Of The Supreme Court On Arbitration (2023)

Supreme Court Delivers a nuanced interpretation of amended Section 29A of the Arbitration Act In January 2023, the Supreme Court (“SC”) in TATA Sons (P) Ltd. v. Siva Industries & Holdings Ltd. & Ors. [1],

NCLT should preclude mentioning date of hearing on the order, when the order is pronounced on a later date: Supreme Court 

The Three Judge Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court (SC) comprising of Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud, Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Mishra in Sanjay Pandurang Kalate v. Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and Others[i] clarifiedthat

Partner of Partnership Firm Can’t Solely Refer A Dispute To Arbitration In Absence of Other Partners: Bombay High Court

The High Court of Bombay (HC) in Shailesh Ranka and Ors. v. Windsor Machines Limited & Ors.[i] held that a firm’s partner cannot solely decide and initiate arbitration proceedings without the consent of the other

Abdullah Qureshi, Associate Partner, INDIALAW LLP quoted in Business Standard

Top 5 I&B Code Supreme Court Landmark Judgments, 2023

1. Supreme Court clarified position on limitation period barring operational claims arising out of multiple invoices In March 2023, the Supreme Court (SC) division bench in M/s. Next Education India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. K12

Sole And Interested Eyewitness’s Testimony Must Be Examined with Great Caution: Supreme Court

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) in the case of Chhote Lal v. Roshtash[1] stated that the testimony of sole eyewitness must be examined with great caution, especially when he was an interested witness as he