ole Eyewitness Testimony Requires Supreme Court Caution

Sole And Interested Eyewitness’s Testimony Must Be Examined with Great Caution: Supreme Court

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) in the case of Chhote Lal v. Roshtash[1] stated that the testimony of sole eyewitness must be examined with great caution, especially when he was an interested witness as he

Court Holds Power to Quash Disciplinary Proceedings Based on Same Charges in Criminal Proceeding That Concluded in Acquittal: Supreme Court

Court Holds Power to Quash Disciplinary Proceedings Based on Same Charges in Criminal Proceeding That Concluded in Acquittal: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court (“SC”) in the case of Ram Lal v. State of Rajasthan[i],dealt with the validity of disciplinary proceedings based on same evidence/ circumstances/ witnesses in a criminal matter that was decided by the

Assertion of Innocence or Assuring Participation in Trial Not Valid Ground to Release Accused on Bail in Serious Offence: Supreme Court

Assertion of Innocence or Assuring Participation in Trial Not Valid Ground to Release Accused on Bail in Serious Offence: Supreme Court

The Division Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) comprising of Justice C.T. Ravikumar and Justice PV Sanjay Kumarwas hearing an appeal against the order of Jharkhand High Court (“HC”) in the State of Jharkhand

Supreme Court: Prior Meeting Not Mandate for Section 34 IPC, Common Intention Can Form During Offence

Prior Meeting of Minds Not a Mandate to Trigger Section 34 IPC, Common Intention Can Form Even During Commission of Offence: Supreme Court

The Division Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising of Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Pankaj Mithal in the matter of Ram Naresh v. State of UP has clarified that to attract Section 34

Magistrate Holds no Power to Modify Its Previous Cognizance Order on Filing of Protest Petition: Supreme Court

Magistrate Holds no Power to Modify Its Previous Cognizance Order on Filing of Protest Petition: Supreme Court

In a notable judgment, the Supreme Court held that the Judicial Magistrate cannot entertain a protest petition against its own order wherein the cognizance has already been taken on a final report. Ramakant Singh and

Second Petition US 482 CR.P.C. Not Maintainable On Grounds

Second Petition U/S 482 CR.P.C. Not Maintainable On Grounds Already Available During First Petition: Supreme Court

Recently, the Supreme Court has passed a notable judgment wherein it held that a second petition filed u/s. 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) on grounds that were already available for challenge during

1 2