![](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Subsequent-Sale-Deed--600x324.png)
Plaintiff Is Not Obligated To Make A Prayer In The Plaint To Set Aside The Subsequent Sale Deed If It Is Executed With A Prior Knowledge Of Agreement To Sell
By a recent judgement, passed in the matter of Maharaj Singh And Ors. v. Karan Singh And Ors.[i], the Hon’ble Supreme Court [“SC”], upheld and relayed the observation made by a larger bench by deciding
![The Applicable Custom Duty Shall Be The One Which Was In Force When The Bills Of Entry Are Presented](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/The-Applicable-Custom-Duty-Shall-Be-The-One-Which-Was-In-Force-When-The-Bills-Of-Entry-Are-Presented-600x324.png)
The Applicable Custom Duty Shall Be The One Which Was In Force When The Bills Of Entry Are Presented
In a recent ruling, a Division Bench of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court comprising of Hon’ble Justice K.R. Shriram and Justice Jitendra Jain clarified a crucial aspect of customs law, specifically the time when the
![Delhi High Court Holds Employment Lock-In Period Clauses As Enforceable, And Disputes On These As Arbitrable](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Delhi-High-Court-Holds-Employment-Lock-In-Period-Clauses-As-Enforceable-And-Disputes-On-These-As-Arbitrable-600x324.png)
Delhi High Court Holds Employment Lock-In Period Clauses As Enforceable, And Disputes On These As Arbitrable
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court (“HC”) recently ruled that a reasonable lock-in period in an employment contract is lawful and thereby, does not infringe upon fundamental rights. The HC clarified that disputes arising from such
![Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 Application Under Order Vii Rule 11 Cannot Be Rejected On The Ground That Written Statements Is Not Filed.](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Code-Of-Civil-Procedure-1908-Application-Under-Order-Vii-Rule-11-Cannot-Be-Rejected-On-The-Ground-That-Written-Statements-Is-Not-Filed-600x324.png)
Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 | Application Under Order Vii Rule 11 Cannot Be Rejected On The Ground That Written Statements Is Not Filed
The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court (“HC”) on 24th June 2024, passed an order[1] pronouncing that, “The filing of a written statement is not a condition precedent for considering an application under Order VIII Rule 11
![Maharashtra Stamp Act Refund of Stamp Duty Cannots Be Denied on Mere Technical Grounds](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Maharashtra-Stamp-Act-Refund-of-Stamp-Duty-Cannots-Be-Denied-on-Mere-Technical-Grounds-600x324.png)
Maharashtra Stamp Act | Refund of Stamp Duty Cannot Be Denied on Mere Technical Grounds
The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”), in a recent decision[i], upheld and relayed an observation made in its earlier decision of Committee-GFIL v. Libra Buildtech Private Limited & Ors.[ii], wherein the Hon’ble SC observed that: “19.
- Arbitration and Conciliation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy Code – Public Announcements
- Civil
- Commercial litigation
- Commercial/Corporate
- Criminal
- Cyber Law
- Debt Recovery
- Food
- IL News
- Infrastructure
- Insolvency & Bankruptcy
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International
- Labour
- Law
- Medico-Legal
- Negotiable Instrument
- NRI Laws
- Policy
- Power
- Real Estate
- Tax