Arbitration and Conciliation

Seat of Arbitration is akin to an Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause

The Supreme Court in a recent judgement in Indus Mobile Distribution Private Limited v. Datawind Innovations Private Limited & ORS (Civil Appeal No in 5370-5371 of 2017) ruled that once the seat of arbitration in

Two Tier Arbitration

In a recent judgement, a three bench division of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in M/S. Centrotrade Minerals & Metal Inc v Hindustan Copper LTD[1]. held that settlement of disputes or differences through two-tier

Foreign Award Unenforceable, If Arbitration Agreement Unsigned

The Delhi High Court in a recent judgement refused the enforcement of the foreign award under section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1966 (“the Act”) as one party to the contract had not

Eitzen Bulk A/S v. Ashapurna Minechem Ltd. & Anr. : Choosing juridical seat of arbitration attracts law applicable to chosen location

In a recent judgement passed by the Supreme Court in Eitzen Bulk A/S v. Ashapurna Minechem Ltd. & Anr.,[1], Justices S. A. Bobde and Fakhir Mohammed Ibrahim Kalifulla, deliberated on the question of applicability of

Union of India v. M/s Ambica Construction

Brief Facts of the Case In the case of Union of India v. M/s Ambica Construction[1], the Appellant had executed an agreement with the Respondent for fabrication of tie bars from M.S. Flats in CST-9

Arbitral award amount is inclusive of pre-award interest

By J.Mandakini In a recent case,[1] the Supreme Court of India discussed the concepts of imposing pre-award and post-award interest on the arbitral award amount under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“The Act”). Facts

1 2
Top