Tag: Limitation

NCLT should preclude mentioning date of hearing on the order, when the order is pronounced on a later date: Supreme Court 

NCLT should preclude mentioning date of hearing on the order, when the order is pronounced on a later date: Supreme Court 

The Three Judge Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court (SC) comprising of Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud, Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Mishra in Sanjay Pandurang Kalate v. Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and Others[i] clarifiedthat

The SC Clarifies The Limitation Period For CIRP And Claim Lodging Based On DRT Recovery Certificate

The SC Clarifies The Limitation Period For The Purposes Of Initiating CIRP And Lodging Claim During CIRP On The Basis Of A DRT Recovery Certificate As Financial Debt.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (SC) in the case of Tottempudi Salalith Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.[1] has affirmed its previous judgments and held that a DRT Recovery Certificate holder shall have, from the

Delhi High Court reiterates its findings on what constitutes non est filing for the purposes of calculating period of limitation.

Introduction The High Court of Delhi, in a recent judgement re-iterated the concept of non-est filing in Ambrosia Corner House Private Limited V. Hangro S Foods1. The Court laid out instances that would constitute non-est

Limitation period for filing applications under I&B Code

The Hon’ble Supreme Court, in Tech Sharp Engineers Private Limited v. Sanghvi Movers Limited (Civil Appeal No. 296 of 2020), on September 19, 2022, held “a claim may not be barred by limitation, it is