---
title: "Seven Day Cure Command: Supreme Court Halts NCLT Rejection for Skipping Section 7(5)(b) Notice"
date: 2025-11-25
author: "Shrishail Kittad"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/insolvency-bankruptcy/supreme-court-restores-section-7-plea-over-missed-notice/
---

# Seven Day Cure Command: Supreme Court Halts NCLT Rejection for Skipping Section 7(5)(b) Notice

Posted On - 25 November, 2025 •

By - [Shrishail Kittad](https://www.indialaw.in/people/adv-shrishail-kittad/ "Posts by Shrishail Kittad") and [Rahul Sundaram](https://www.indialaw.in/people/rahul-sundaram/ "Posts by Rahul Sundaram")

[![Seven Day Cure Command: Supreme Court Halts NCLT Rejection for Skipping Section 7(5)(b) Notice](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/428330.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/428330.jpg)

In Civil Appeal No. 11766 of 2025 the Supreme Court, through Justices Sanjay Kumar and Alok Aradhe, has restated a cardinal principle of insolvency practice: before rejecting a financial creditor’s initiation petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 the adjudicating authority must first hand the applicant itself a seven day healing notice under the second proviso to Section 7(5)(b). Anything short, the Bench held on 24 November 2025, is jurisdictional error. The judgment arose from a hard fought contest between Live-in Aqua Solutions Private Limited, the corporate debtor, and HDFC Bank Limited, the lender that had extended five and a half crore rupees only to watch the account slip into nonperforming territory on 4 August 2019. 

The chronology is instructive. The bank filed Form1 on 26 July 2023, verified that day but supported by an affidavit a week older. At the scrutiny stage the Registry bundled the petition with twenty five others, published a consolidated defect sheet on 10 October 2023 and warned every listed party to cure shortcomings within seven days. No separate intimation, couched in the language of the Code’s proviso, ever reached the bank itself. When the defects lingered the Joint Registrar refused registration on 18 October 2023, relying on Rule 28(4) of the NCLT Rules, 2016. 

HDFC Bank invoked Rule 63 and persuaded the President of the NCLT to recall the refusal on 8 February 2024, subject to costs. The corporate debtor carried the battle to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, saw its appeal dismissed as infructuous on 15 July 2024, but found fresh life when the appellate tribunal, in a second appeal, held on 27 August 2025 that the proviso to Section 7(5)(b) had been shortcircuited and immediately remanded the petition to the NCLT for a decision on merits. The debtor then scaled the appellate ladder once more, contending before the Supreme Court that an affidavit predating the verification date rendered the entire application non est and that restoration without a direction for a clean affidavit was impermissible. 

Livein Aqua pressed the Court to treat the premature affidavit as a fatal, incurable flaw, invoking Rules 10 and 34 of the NCLT Rules and arguing that the NCLAT had transformed an irremediable nullity into a mere curable hiccup. The bank, fortified by the precedent in Dena Bank v. C. Shivakumar Reddy, insisted that the second proviso to Section 7(5)(b) is not a decorative clause; it casts a mandatory obligation on the Tribunal to serve the applicant itself with a specific seven day notice before any rejection. A consolidated posting on the website, it argued, could not satisfy this legislative command. 

The Supreme Court agreed with the bank’s reading of the statute. It held that the proviso is directory cum mandatory, and that a defective affidavit is an irregularity that can be healed, not a congenital defect that stillbirths the petition. The Bench recalled its own observations in Vidyawati Gupta and Uday Shankar Triyar that procedure is the handmaiden of justice and should not be fashioned into a guillotine for substantive rights. 

Yet the Court also chided the NCLAT for stopping short of the logical next step. Having correctly identified the procedural lapse, the appellate tribunal ought to have given the bank a fresh, timebound mandate to file a compliant affidavit instead of simply pushing the file back to the NCLT. Equity, the Court observed, required both recognition of the lapse and direction for its cure. 

The appeal was therefore disposed of with a crisp, seven day prescription. HDFC Bank must remove every defect, including the filing of a fresh affidavit, in C.P.(IB)/97(AHM)/2024 within one week from the date of the judgment. Once that is done the NCLT, Ahmedabad Bench, will take the petition on its merits and decide it according to law. Each side will bear its own costs.

## Conclusion

The ruling reestablishes that summary procedure under the IBC,2016 is not an open invitation to cut procedural corners. A missing sevenday notice may seem trivial, but the Supreme Court has now branded it a jurisdictional flaw capable of unravelling months of litigation. For financial creditors the lesson is simple: perfect your papers, but if you falter the statute still grants you a week of grace. For tribunals the message is equally stark: cure first, reject later because justice delayed by procedural lapses is justice denied to the entire credit ecosystem.

For further details write to [contact@indialaw.in](mailto:contact@indialaw.in)

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/insolvency-bankruptcy/supreme-court-restores-section-7-plea-over-missed-notice//pdf/)

[Insolvency & Bankruptcy](https://www.indialaw.in/expertise/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-laws/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---