---
title: "Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Insolvency Resolution Provisions Pertaining to Personal Guarantors"
date: 2023-11-09
author: "Shivangi Dubey"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/insolvency-bankruptcy/sc-upholds-validity-of-insolvency-provisions-for-guarantors/
---

# Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Insolvency Resolution Provisions Pertaining to Personal Guarantors

Posted On - 9 November, 2023 •

By - [Shivangi Dubey](https://www.indialaw.in/author/shivangi-dubey/ "Posts by Shivangi Dubey") and [Arjun Sathees](https://www.indialaw.in/author/arjun-sathees/ "Posts by Arjun Sathees")

[![Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Insolvency Resolution Provisions Pertaining to Personal Guarantors](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/SC-Upholds-Validity-of-Insolvency-Provisions-for-Guarantors.png)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/SC-Upholds-Validity-of-Insolvency-Provisions-for-Guarantors.png)

The Supreme Court in ***Surendra B. Jiwrajika and Anr. vs. Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited***[[i]](#_edn1) upheld the constitutionality of the provisions under Part-III, Chapter-III of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I&B Code) pertaining to Insolvency Resolution of Personal Guarantors.

## **Contentions of the Petitioner**

The Petitioners contested on the grounds of Sections 95(1), 96(1), 97(5), 99(1), 99(2), 99(4), 99(5), 99(6), and 100 of the I&B Code and alleged that principles of natural justice and due process was not followed. It was argued that the personal guarantor was not given any opportunity to present his case or dispute the initiation of appointment of the Resolution Professional which would render the provisions arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

## **Overview of Sections that were under challenge:**

Section 95 of the I&B Code allows the creditors to initiate Insolvency Proceedings against personal guarantors. It can be initiated independently or jointly or through a resolution professional. If there exist no disciplinary issues with the selection of the resolution professional, then the Adjudicating Authority will appoint the Resolution Professional to oversee the Resolution Process for the personal guarantor. Under the said provision, the personal guarantor does not get any opportunity to present their case or challenge the appointment of the Resolution Professional.

As per Section 95(2) of the I&B Code, the Resolution Professional has the discretion to ask the debtor for evidence of debt repayment as claimed by the creditor.

On filing of an application of initiation of the resolution process, Section 96 of the I&B Code imposes an interim moratorium which prohibits any coercive actions by creditors, but does not prohibit the personal guarantor from alienating or otherwise dealing with their assets.

Under Section 99 of the I&B Code, the Resolution Professional is required to review the application filed under Sections 94 or 95 within 10 days of their appointment and file a Report with the Adjudicating Authority recommending either the approval or rejection of the application.

Further, under Section 100 of the I&B Code, the Adjudicating Authority decides on whether the application ought to be admitted or rejected after hearing both the applicant/creditor, the personal guarantor and after considering the Resolution Professional’s Report. On admission of the application under Section 100 by the Adjudicating Authority, a moratorium is imposed under Section 101 of the I&B Code, which in addition to the already existing prohibitions under the interim moratorium, also prohibits the personal grantor from transferring, encumbering or disposing of their assets, legal rights, or beneficial interests.

## **Decision of the Supreme Court**

The Supreme Court stated that Section 95 to 100 of the I&B Code cannot be held as unconstitutional for not granting an opportunity of hearing during the pre-admission stage under Section 95 to the personal guarantors while appointing the Resolution Professional, since the principle of natural justice i.e., opportunity of being heard, cannot be applied as a straight fit jacket formula and it varies on case-to-case basis.

The Supreme Court held that Section 96 interim moratorium, which applies from the date of filing of the insolvency petition, is protective in nature as it insulates the personal guarantor from the legal actions arising out of the debt until the insolvency application is finally heard under Section 100 of the I&B Code.

The Supreme Court clarified that since there was no manifest arbitrariness in the law, the Court would not attempt to rewrite clear legislative mandate, and observed as follows:

*“The statute (IBC) does not suffer from any manifest arbitrariness to violate Art 14 of the Constitution”*.

*“It cannot read an adjudicatory role into these provisions and that the entire process of timelines would be rendered negatory if the role of adjudicator is changed. For the Court to change the adjudicatory role envisaged under these provisions would amount to “rewriting the legislative functions”*.

The Supreme Court also clarified that a recommendatory report by the Resolution Professional does not have a binding effect, and therefore it cannot be said that the Resolution Professional has been confer adjudicatory powers. Section 99 of the I&B Code requires the Resolution Professional to only act as a facilitator gathering relevant information and to recommend acceptance or rejection of application, and the actual adjudication commences under Section 100 of the I&B Code by the Adjudicating Authority, after the Resolution Professional has submitted their report.

This landmark judgement of the Supreme Court is instrumental in bringing in much-needed clarity to the nascent area of personal insolvency laws in India. It is pertinent to note that Part-III, Chapter -III of the I&B Code is currently applicable only to personal guarantors to corporate debtors.

---

[[i]](#_ednref1) **SLP(C) No. 016464/2021 + connected matters**

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/insolvency-bankruptcy/sc-upholds-validity-of-insolvency-provisions-for-guarantors//pdf/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---