---
title: "Operational Creditors Cannot File Joint Application"
date: 2017-08-01
author: "Arundhati Sukhtankar"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/insolvency-bankruptcy/operational-creditors-cannot-file-joint-application/
---

# Operational Creditors Cannot File Joint Application

Posted On - 1 August, 2017 •

By - [Arundhati Sukhtankar](https://www.indialaw.in/author/arundhati-sukhtankar/ "Posts by Arundhati Sukhtankar")

[![NCLT](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/bankruptcy_img.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/bankruptcy_img.jpg)

**Operational Creditors Cannot File Joint Application**

** **National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT) in *Uttam Galva Steel Limited Vs. DF Deutsche Forfaight AG[**[1]**](#_ftn1)* considered the following questions under Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (the “**Code**”):

1. Whether a joint application by two or more operational creditors’ is maintainable under Section 9 of the Code?
2. Whether it is mandatory to file a ‘certificate of recognized financial institution’ along with an application under Section 9 of the Code?
3. Whether a lawyer can issue demand notice under Section 8 of the Code on behalf of an Operational Creditor?

NCLAT was considering an appeal filed against an order of the Tribunal, which admitted an application under the Code.

1. Joint application by operational creditors

The cause of action arose out of a sale contract for sale of goods. Through an assignment deed, the right to receive payment under the contract has been vested with two entities, which are respondents under the current appeal. The appellant argued that two separate operational creditors could not file joint application under Section 9 of Code. The respondents, on the other hand, argued that there is only a single transaction and right to receive payment under the said transaction has been vested with two parties. Hence, a joint application filed by two respondents under a single cause of action is maintainable. After going though the provisions of Sections 8 and 9 of the Code, NCLAT held that a notice under Section 8 is to be issued by an Operational Creditor individually and the petition under Section 9 has to be filed by Operational Creditor individually and not jointly.

2. Certificate of financial institution

NCLAT also considered whether it is mandatory to file ‘certificate of recognized financial institution’ along with an application under Section 9 of the Code? While deciding this issue, NCLAT followed its own earlier judgment[[2]](#_ftn2) on the same issue and reiterated that such certificate from a financial institution, maintaining accounts of the operational creditor, confirming that there is no payment of an unpaid operational debt by the corporate debtor is mandatory. NCLAT held that the certificate filed by the respondent is not from a recognized ‘financial institution’ as it is issued by a foreign bank and not maintainable.

3. Demand notice *vs.* lawyer’s notice

One of the contentions of the appellant was that the demand notice was not issued by the respondents but through their lawyer, who was not an authorized person. While considering this contention, NCLAT examined the formats of demand notices under the Code and held that demand notice/invoice needs to be issued either by the operational creditor or by a person who is authorized to act on behalf of the operation creditor. NCLAT held that a demand notice is different from a lawyer notice and an advocate/company secretary/chartered accountant can send demand notice on behalf of corporate debtor only if he has the authority of the board of directors. He is also required to state his position or relation with debtor in the notice. In the absence of such authority, his notice is invalid.

NCLAT also admitted another contention of the appellant that there was an existing dispute. Considering these aspects, NCLAT set aside the order of the Tribunal and dismissed the application filed by the respondents.

[[1]](#_ftnref1) Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) 39 of 2017

[[2]](#_ftnref2) *Smart Timing Steel Limited vs. National Steel and Agro Industries Limited*Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 28 of 2017

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/insolvency-bankruptcy/operational-creditors-cannot-file-joint-application//pdf/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---