---
title: "Analysis of the Jet Airways Insolvency Case and the Shortcomings of the IBC, 2016"
date: 2024-12-11
author: "Shrishail Kittad"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/insolvency-bankruptcy/jet-airways-insolvency-examining-ibc-2016-shortcomings/
---

# Analysis of the Jet Airways Insolvency Case and the Shortcomings of the IBC, 2016

Posted On - 11 December, 2024 •

By - [Shrishail Kittad](https://www.indialaw.in/people/adv-shrishail-kittad/ "Posts by Shrishail Kittad") and [Rahul Sundaram](https://www.indialaw.in/people/rahul-sundaram/ "Posts by Rahul Sundaram")

[![Jet Airways Insolvency Case and the Shortcomings of the IBC](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/jet-airways.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/jet-airways.jpg)

The Jet Airways (India) Limited insolvency case has garnered significant attention as it highlights critical aspects of the [Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code](https://www.indialaw.in/expertise/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-laws/) (IBC), 2016, and the challenges associated with corporate resolution processes in India. This article delves into the factual matrix, issue-wise analysis, shortcomings of the IBC, and the concluding observations from the court.

## **Factual Matrix**

The recent legal deliberations stemmed from a judgment by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) concerning Jet Airways’ corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP), initiated in June 2019. The State Bank of India (SBI) led the charge, filing an application under the IBC with total claims exceeding ₹7,800 Crore from various financial creditors.

An approved resolution plan presented by a consortium was favoured overwhelmingly by the Committee of Creditors (CoC), receiving a staggering 99.22% majority approval. This plan included a Performance Bank Guarantee (PBG) of ₹150 Crore and demanded an upfront payment of ₹350 Crore within 180 days of the “Effective Date,” set for May 20, 2022. However, disputes arose regarding the adjustments of the PBG against initial payments and the conditions precedent that needed to be fulfilled, leading to a series of appeals and legal scrutiny.

## **Issue-wise Analysis**

1. **Adjustment of Performance Bank Guarantee (PBG):**The court ruled that invoking the PBG against the initial tranche payment was not permissible under the resolution plan’s terms and relevant regulations. The PBG was intended to ensure compliance with the plan, affirming the legitimacy of its invocation due to the Strategic Resolution Applicant’s (SRA) failure to meet payment obligations.
2. **Non-implementation of the Resolution Plan:** Attention was directed towards whether the failure of the SRA to carry out the resolution plan warranted a shift to liquidation under Section 33(3) of the IBC. The court concluded that non-payment of crucial dues—like airport and employee payments—signified a failure of the resolution initiative, justifying the path to liquidation.
3. **Timely Implementation:**The tribunal emphasized that swift implementation of the resolution plan is paramount within the IBC’s framework. Delays not only risk asset depreciation but also undermine the resolution process, making strict adherence to timelines essential.

## **Shortcomings and Suggestions for the IBC, 2016**

The Jet Airways judgment shone a light on several shortcomings within the IBC, alongside proposed enhancements:

- **Strengthening the Ecosystem:** It is vital to continually identify and rectify limitations in the IBC to ensure favourable outcomes for all stakeholders involved in the insolvency process.
- **Adherence to Provisions:** Key participants—including adjudicating authorities and resolution professionals—must rigorously follow IBC provisions to uphold its integrity and effectiveness.
- **Commercial Wisdom of CoC:**The commercial decisions made by the CoC should remain non-justiciable to ensure efficiency and promptness in resolution processes.
- **Monitoring Committee:**The establishment of a statutory Monitoring Committee was suggested to oversee resolution plan implementations, ensuring compliance and accountability.
- **Timely Adjudication:** Timeliness in admitting and disposing of applications related to CIRP is critical to mitigate value erosion of corporate entities.
- **Infrastructure and Capacity Issues:** Adequate infrastructure and expanded member capacity in the NCLT and NCLAT are necessary to handle cases efficiently, facilitating smoother resolutions.

## **Conclusion**

The court’s ultimate verdict deemed the NCLAT’s earlier order as unsustainable, leading to complications in Jet Airways’ resolution trajectory. Given the significant delays and a lack of resolution plan implementation, the court utilized its jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution to mandate the company’s liquidation. The previously infused ₹200 Crore by the SRA was forfeited, and lenders were permitted to encash the ₹150 Crore PBG.

This ruling hghlights the necessity for timely resolution and strict adherence to the objectives of the IBC. Furthermore, the court urged the government to deliberate on the suggested improvements to bolster the insolvency framework, ensuring it can effectively handle complex cases like Jet Airways and safeguard the interests of all stakeholders. The Jet Airways case serves as a critical reminder of both the challenges and the imperative reforms needed within India’s insolvency ecosystem.

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/insolvency-bankruptcy/jet-airways-insolvency-examining-ibc-2016-shortcomings//pdf/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---