---
title: "Financial Obligations in Corporate Insolvency: A NCLT Verdict on CIRP Costs "
date: 2025-12-18
author: "Shrishail Kittad"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/insolvency-bankruptcy/cirp-costs-binding-on-coc-members/
---

# Financial Obligations in Corporate Insolvency: A NCLT Verdict on CIRP Costs 

Posted On - 18 December, 2025 •

By - [Shrishail Kittad](https://www.indialaw.in/people/adv-shrishail-kittad/ "Posts by Shrishail Kittad") and [Rahul Sundaram](https://www.indialaw.in/people/rahul-sundaram/ "Posts by Rahul Sundaram")

[![CIRP costs on CoC members](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/128867.jpeg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/128867.jpeg)

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has reaffirmed the legal enforceability of costs approved during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), highlighting the binding nature of decisions taken by the Committee of Creditors (CoC). In a landmark ruling delivered on December 16, 2025, the Tribunal addressed the financial responsibilities of creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), emphasizing that participation in CoC deliberations without objection constitutes an implicit obligation to contribute to insolvency-related expenses. This judgment, rendered in *Mr.VIKRAM KUMAR (Resolution Professional of Dr. Jain Video on Wheels Ltd.) v. CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.*, establishes a critical precedent for accountability and procedural integrity within corporate insolvency proceedings. 

Dr. Jain Video on Wheels Ltd. was adjudicated as a corporate debtor following an insolvency application filed by Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. on June 3, 2021. The NCLT appointed Mr. Manoj Kulshrestha as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to oversee the initial phase of the CIRP. Subsequently, at the first meeting of the CoC held on July 6, 2021, the member resolved to appoint Mr. Vikram Kumar as the Resolution Professional (RP). With this appointment, the RP assumed statutory authority to manage the affairs of the corporate debtor, including the approval and oversight of all necessary expenditures incurred during the resolution process. 

The dispute arose when CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd., a member of the CoC, failed to discharge its share of the CIRP costs amounting to ₹14,85,826.62, despite having participated in multiple CoC meetings where these expenses were discussed and formally approved. The applicant, Mr. Vikram Kumar, submitted that the costs had been duly sanctioned from the third CoC meeting onward, with no formal objections raised by any member, including the respondent. He further contended that the non-payment significantly impeded his ability to perform essential functions under Section 17 of the IBC, such as asset management, stakeholder communication, and preparation of resolution plans. 

CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. contested the claim not on the grounds of cost validity but on procedural technicalities, asserting internal delays in approval processes and disagreements over fee structures. However, the NCLT found these arguments insufficient to justify non-compliance. The Tribunal observed that the absence of any formal challenge during the CoC meetings amounted to tacit acceptance of the approved expenditure. Furthermore, the respondent’s failure to raise objections at the time of decision-making precluded it from later invoking procedural irregularities to evade financial responsibility. 

In interpreting the legal framework, the NCLT invoked Section 60(5) of the IBC, which empowers the Tribunal to issue directions necessary for the effective administration of the insolvency process. The Court drew upon established precedents, including *Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd. v. Noble Resourcing Business & Solutions Pvt. Ltd.* and *Tathagata Bhattacharya v. World Consulting & Research Corp. Pvt. Ltd.*, to reinforce the principle that CoC resolutions on operational costs are binding on all participating creditors. The Tribunal emphasized that the CoC functions as a collective body, and once a decision is adopted through democratic consensus, individual members cannot selectively disavow their obligations. 

The judgment highlighted a fundamental tenet of insolvency law: creditors cannot benefit from the resolution process while evading their financial contributions. The Tribunal stressed that allowing such conduct would undermine the credibility of the CoC and compromise the efficiency of the entire CIRP mechanism. It noted that the timely payment of CIRP costs is not merely a fiscal matter but a prerequisite for the RP to carry out his duties effectively, ensuring transparency, continuity, and fairness in the resolution process. 

Consequently, the NCLT allowed the application and directed CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. to pay the outstanding sum of ₹14,85,826.62 within a specified period. The order explicitly affirmed that the costs approved by the CoC are legally enforceable against all members who participated in the decision-making process, regardless of whether they voted in favour or abstained. The Tribunal also cautioned against the use of procedural delays as shields from financial obligations arising from collective decisions. 

By affirming the enforceability of CoC-approved costs, the NCLT has strengthened the institutional framework governing the IBC, ensuring that resolution professionals are not hindered by non-cooperative creditors. The decision reinforces the principle of equitable burden-sharing among creditors and promotes good-faith participation in the CIRP. 

In conclusion, the case of *Vikram Kumar v. CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.* serves as a clarion call for creditors to uphold their financial commitments during insolvency proceedings. It underscores the importance of collective responsibility and the sanctity of CoC decisions in maintaining the integrity of the resolution process. As the Indian insolvency regime continues to evolve, this judgment provides a robust foundation for ensuring accountability, operational efficiency, and legal certainty in future corporate insolvency cases. 

For further details write to [contact@indialaw.in](mailto:contact@indialaw.in) 

[Insolvency & Bankruptcy](https://www.indialaw.in/expertise/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-laws/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---