---
title: "Locked Out of Equality: How One Provision of the Hindu Succession Act Bars Tribal Women"
date: 2025-08-06
author: "Nidhi Singh"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/family-law/rajasthan-hc-questions-st-womens-exclusion-from-hindu-succession-act/
---

# Locked Out of Equality: How One Provision of the Hindu Succession Act Bars Tribal Women

Posted On - 6 August, 2025 •

By - [Nidhi Singh](https://www.indialaw.in/people/adv-nidhi-singh/ "Posts by Nidhi Singh") and [Akshita Singh](https://www.indialaw.in/author/akshita-singh/ "Posts by Akshita Singh")

[![babys hand on human palm](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/odihqypcuuk.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/odihqypcuuk.jpg)

## **Introduction**

Equality is India’s most celebrated yet one of the most broken constitutional promises. In a case before the Rajasthan High Court – Manni Devi v. Rama Devi & Ors., the Court reviewed a provision of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (“HSA”) that continues to exclude Scheduled Tribe women from statutory inheritance rights. This case is particularly striking, not only for its legal reasoning, but for its reminder that legislative inaction can perpetuate structural inequality even in the face of progressive constitutional ideals.

While the 2005 amendment to the HSA was celebrated as a landmark in achieving gender parity in property rights for women, Section 2(2) remains an unaltered exception, leaving tribal women dependent on uncertain customary practices or discretionary judicial intervention. The Rajasthan High Court’s decision is more than a routine interpretation of statute as it is a call for urgent legislative reform and serves as a reminder that equality must be both a constitutional value and a lived reality.

## **Background of the Case**

In Manni Devi v. Rama Devi & Ors. (Rajasthan High Court, 2025), the petitioner, a Meena woman belonging to the Scheduled Tribes, challenged the denial of her statutory inheritance rights under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The dispute arose when her father, Panchu, executed a gift deed in March 2018 transferring ancestral land to the respondent, Rama Devi. As the sole child with no brothers, Manni Devi filed a civil suit seeking cancellation of the deed, but the trial court directed her to first establish her khatedari rights before the competent revenue authority.

When the petitioner approached the Board of Revenue, her claim was dismissed outright on the basis of Section 2(2) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which excludes members of Scheduled Tribes from the application of the Act unless the Central Government issues a specific notification. This meant that, irrespective of the 2005 amendment granting equal coparcenary rights to daughters, she could not claim statutory inheritance as a tribal woman. By transferring the land exclusively to the respondent, the petitioner’s father effectively alienated property in which she claimed an equal, birth‑based interest.

The challenge to the gift deed thus became the procedural gateway to securing her inheritance rights. This made the gift deed dispute a constitutional flashpoint: if the exclusion under Section 2(2) stood, the petitioner could not even approach the court to contest an alienation of property she believed was rightfully hers. Consequently, the case raised broader questions about the interplay between personal law exemptions, property rights, and constitutional guarantees of equality under **Articles 14, 15, and 21**.

## **Court’s Observations**

Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, presiding over the matter, noted that Section 2(2) acts as a “formidable barrier” for tribal women to inherit property from their fathers. He emphasised that this statutory exception was “manifestly unjustified” when compared to the rights available to non‑tribal daughters, and highlighted that even decades after the enactment of the HSA, no comprehensive legislative or executive measure had been taken to address this exclusion.

## **Judgment and Relief**

The Rajasthan High Court, in its judgment, set aside the Board of Revenue’s order that had barred Manni Devi’s inheritance claim. As relief, the Court restored Manni Devi’s claim challenging the 2018 gift deed to be heard and decided on merits before the competent revenue authority, thereby reopening her path to assert her property rights. The Court called for urgent intervention, stressing that Parliament must amend Section 2(2) or the Central Government must issue a notification to extend the Act’s benefits to Scheduled Tribe women, and that the legislature and executive cannot remain passive spectators in the face of discrimination.

## **Why This Matters**

Inheritance rights are more than a matter of legal entitlement, they are a cornerstone of economic empowerment, social equality, and constitutional justice. Property rights are integral to women’s socio‑economic empowerment, and denying these rights to tribal women perpetuates historical injustice and entrenched inequality. Amending Section 2(2) or issuing a central notification is therefore essential to transform court pronouncements into lasting, uniform rights for all women in India, regardless of their community status.

## **Conclusion**

The Manni Devi verdict does more than correct an individual injustice, it shines a harsh light on a legal gap that continues to strip millions of tribal women of their rightful inheritance. By dismantling the shield of Section 2(2), the Court has reaffirmed that equality cannot be conditional and dignity cannot be selective. But without swift action from Parliament or the Central Government, this victory risks becoming symbolic rather than transformative. Equal inheritance is not merely about property, it is about dismantling centuries‑old structures of marginalisation and ensuring that every woman, regardless of her community, can stand as an equal stakeholder in her family’s legacy.

For more details, write to us at: [contact@indialaw.in](mailto:contact@indialaw.in)

[Family Law Dispute](https://www.indialaw.in/expertise/litigation/family-law-dispute/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---