---
title: "Allahabad High Court Upholds Pollution Control Board’s Power to Levy Environmental Compensation"
date: 2025-09-17
author: "Rahul Sundaram"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/environment/allahabad-hc-upholds-environmental-compensation-power/
---

# Allahabad High Court Upholds Pollution Control Board’s Power to Levy Environmental Compensation

Posted On - 17 September, 2025 •

By - [Rahul Sundaram](https://www.indialaw.in/people/rahul-sundaram/ "Posts by Rahul Sundaram") and [Divy Lotia](https://www.indialaw.in/author/divy-lotia/ "Posts by Divy Lotia")

[![Allahabad High Court Upholds Pollution Control Board’s Power to Levy Environmental Compensation](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/dyxfhf44ydw.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/dyxfhf44ydw.jpg)

## **Introduction**

In a significant development for environmental law, the Allahabad High Court has affirmed the right of Pollution Control Boards to levy environmental compensation. The ruling in **M/s Ramesh Dyeing and Washing, Ghaziabad v. State of U.P. & Ors.[**[1]**](#_ftn1)** upheld the actions of the U.P. Pollution Control Board, confirming its authority to impose both closure orders and compensation. This verdict reinforces the Polluter Pays doctrine and sets a clear precedent that regulatory bodies have the power to hold industries accountable for environmental damages.

## **Background of the Case**

The case began when the U.P. Pollution Control Board ordered a shutdown of the petitioner’s industrial unit on August 12, 2021, and fined them ₹14,20,000 in environmental compensation. The Board later offered to cancel the shutdown order if the petitioner paid the balance of ₹13,20,000 within two months, as per a modified order on June 28, 2022. The petitioner challenged this, arguing that only the National Green Tribunal (NGT), not the Board, had the authority to impose such a fine under Section 33A of the Water Act. They referenced the Supreme Court’s Kantha Vibhag Yuva Koli Samaj Parivartan Trust v. State of Gujarat[[2]](#_ftn2) (2022) judgment to back their position.

## **Court’s Analysis**

The court clarified that the petitioner’s reliance on the Kantha Vibhag judgment was misplaced, as that case did not address the question of whether Pollution Control Boards could impose environmental compensation. Instead, the Court turned to the more recent and authoritative ruling of the Supreme Court in Delhi Pollution Control Committee v. Lodhi Property Company Ltd.[[3]](#_ftn3)

In Lodhi Property, the Supreme Court held that Pollution Control Boards, exercising powers under Section 33A of the Water Act, 1974, and Section 31A of the Air Act, 1981, can impose restitutionary and compensatory damages. These powers, though not explicitly stated, are incidental and ancillary to their statutory mandate and derive support from the Polluter Pays principle.

The High Court further referred to earlier landmark cases such as M.C. Mehta v. Union of India[[4]](#_ftn4) (1987), and Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India[[5]](#_ftn5) (1996), which firmly established that liability for environmental harm includes both compensatory and restorative obligations. Additionally, the Court noted that the National Green Tribunal in State PCB, Odisha v. Swastik Ispat Pvt. Ltd.[[6]](#_ftn6) (2014) had already distinguished between punitive action and compensatory damages, a position later approved by the Supreme Court.

Thus, the Court affirmed that the U.P. Pollution Control Board’s powers under Section 33A of the Water Act and Section 31A of the Air Act are comparable to the Central Government’s powers under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Importantly, such directions are remedial in nature, not punitive, and are necessary to prevent or address environmental harm.

## **Jurisdictional Concerns and Delay**

While High Courts have the authority to hear such cases under Article 226 of the Constitution, the court decided not to exercise that power in this instance. The court noted two key reasons for its decision: first, the petitioner did not use the prescribed appeal process under the NGT Act, and second, there was an unexplained delay of over three years in filing the petition.

## **Conclusion**

The Allahabad High Court has reaffirmed that Pollution Control Boards have the authority to impose environmental compensation under Section 33A of the Water Act and Section 31A of the Air Act, in consonance with the Polluter Pays principle. This ruling strengthens the enforcement framework for environmental protection and highlights that remedial action by regulatory authorities is integral to safeguarding public health and ecological balance. The decision also highlights that while writ jurisdiction of High Courts remains intact, parties must ordinarily pursue statutory remedies before the NGT. This judgment is significant because it not only fortifies the regulatory power of Pollution Control Boards but also bridges the gap between judicial pronouncements and practical enforcement of environmental laws. It reinforces the need for industries to internalize environmental accountability as a cost of doing business and serves as a clear reminder that non-compliance will attract compensatory consequences.

For more details, write to us at: [**contact@indialaw.in**](mailto:contact@indialaw.in)

---

[[1]](#_ftnref1) Writ-C No. 7305 of 2025

[[2]](#_ftnref2) Civil Appeal No.1046 of 2019

[[3]](#_ftnref3) Civil Appeal No.757-760 of 2013

[[4]](#_ftnref4) 1987) 1 SCC 395

[[5]](#_ftnref5) (1996) 5 SCC 647

[[6]](#_ftnref6) (2014) SCC Online NGT 13

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/environment/allahabad-hc-upholds-environmental-compensation-power//pdf/)

[Environmental Law](https://www.indialaw.in/expertise/environmental-law/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---