---
title: "Delhi High Court Quashes FIR in Live-In Relationship Dispute, Imposes Cost for Casual Use of Criminal Law"
date: 2025-07-17
author: "Durgesh Singh"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/criminal/live-in-relationship-dispute/
---

# Delhi High Court Quashes FIR in Live-In Relationship Dispute, Imposes Cost for Casual Use of Criminal Law

Posted On - 17 July, 2025 •

By - [Durgesh Singh](https://www.indialaw.in/people/adv-durgesh-singh/ "Posts by Durgesh Singh") and [Riddhi Agarwal](https://www.indialaw.in/author/riddhi-agarwal/ "Posts by Riddhi Agarwal")

[![silhouette of two person walking beside beach - live-in relationship](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/erkkicnxwmq.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/erkkicnxwmq.jpg)

## Introduction

In a significant ruling balancing the principles of justice with the misuse of criminal proceedings, the Delhi High Court on 15 July 2025 quashed an FIR registered under Sections 69 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The case involved allegations arising from a long-term live-in relationship that eventually soured, leading to serious [criminal charges](https://www.indialaw.in/expertise/criminal-litigation-law-firm/) against the petitioner.

## Background

Anil Verma (Petitioner) and Respondent No.2 had been in a close relationship for 15 years and were residing together in a live-in relationship since January 2019. The Petitioner was married and had promised Respondent No.2 for marriage upon divorce with his legally wedded wife, which never materialized. The petitioner was scheduled to file the second motion for divorce in May 2025.

Prior to this incident, there had been certain misunderstandings between the parties due to which the Respondent No. 2 lodged an FIR bearing no. 154/2025, registered at Police Station Prashant Vihar, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Section 69/351(2) of BNS.

Subsequently, the parties reached an amicable settlement. The complainant, present in court, admitted the complaint was filed during a period of emotional and medical distress and no longer wished to pursue the matter. She also acknowledged their cohabitation and that the locality knew them as a couple.

## State’s Opposition

The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the quashing. It argued that allowing compromise in such cases, especially those involving allegations of sexual exploitation, sets a concerning precedent and weakens the criminal justice system’s safeguards for women

## Court’s Observation

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma took a nuanced view. While acknowledging the seriousness of the charges and cautioning against filing such complaints casually, the Court also recognised the complainant’s autonomy and the genuine personal nature of the dispute.

The Court stressed that forcing trial in a case where both parties have reconciled and the complainant has expressly withdrawn her allegations would be counterproductive and an abuse of legal process.

However, the judge also noted that activating the criminal machinery based on a misunderstanding, especially in such grave matters, cannot be taken lightly. To discourage misuse of criminal law, the Court imposed a cost of ₹20,000 on the complainant, payable to the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee.

## Statutory Framework

| Provision  | Key Principle  |
| --- | --- |
| Section 69, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023  | Covers assault or use of criminal force on a woman with intent to outrage her modesty.   
Punishment: Up to 3 years’ imprisonment and fine.  |
| Section 351(2), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023  | Deals with cheating by false promise of marriage leading to exploitation.  |

## Verdict

The FIR No. 154/2025 and all consequential proceedings were quashed. However, the Court issued a cautionary reminder: invoking criminal law should not become a tool for [emotional leverage in personal relationships](https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescoachescouncil/2023/05/16/relationship-management-how-women-of-color-can-leverage-emotional-intelligence-to-level-up-as-leaders/), especially when such invocation comes with serious legal and reputational consequences.

## Conclusion

This judgment highlights the judiciary’s delicate role in navigating between the need to uphold justice and the importance of preventing misuse of criminal law in intimate personal disputes. While the Court showed compassion in acknowledging the complainant’s circumstances and allowed the FIR to be quashed, it also reinforced a critical message that criminal proceedings are not meant to be casually triggered in the heat of personal grievances. By imposing costs, the Court sent a strong signal that the legal system must not be used as a tool of pressure or retribution in emotionally charged relationships. The ruling ultimately promotes both accountability and restraint, setting a precedent for how similar cases should be approached going forward.

For further details, write to us at: [contact@indialaw.in](mailto:contact@indialaw.in)

[Criminal Litigation](https://www.indialaw.in/expertise/criminal-litigation-law-firm/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---