---
title: "SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) ACT, 1956 PREVAILS OVER OTHER GENERAL PROVISIONS"
date: 2016-08-02
author: "J. Mandakini"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/commercialcorporate/securities-contracts-regulation-act-1956-prevails-general-provisions/
---

# SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) ACT, 1956 PREVAILS OVER OTHER GENERAL PROVISIONS

Posted On - 2 August, 2016 •

By - [J. Mandakini](https://www.indialaw.in/author/j-mandakini/ "Posts by J. Mandakini")

[![|](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/img5.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/img5.jpg)

**Introduction**

In the instant case of *Securities and Exchange Board of India v. M/s. Opee Stock-Link Ltd. & Anr.*[[1]](#_ftn1), the Supreme Court explored certain irregularities/illegalities in the Initial Public Offerings (“**IPO**”) of two companies, viz., Jet Airways Limited and Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited.

**Facts**

Jet Airways Limited and Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited issued certain shares in the form of IPO, which were over-subscribed. This was brought to the notice of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“**SEBI**”). It was observed by officials of SEBI upon investigation, that the shares which were meant for small investors had been unscrupulously purchased by several hundreds of fictitious demat account holders through off market transactions. This directly violates Sections 12A (a), (b), (c) of the SEBI Act, 1992, and Regulations 3 and 4(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Markets) Regulations, 2003.

**Decision of the Whole Time Member and the Adjudicating Officer of the SEBI, and Securities Appellate Tribunal**

The investigations conducted by the officials of SEBI revealed that several shares had been purchased fraudulently through demat accounts at a price much lower than the market price, even prior to the date of listing without knowing the price of these shares, through off market transactions. They also concluded that these demat accounts through which these purchases had been made, were not genuine, and had been operated for the benefit of someone who was financing these fake demat accounts. Further, signatures of holders of these accounts were not consistent, and registered addresses of the account holders were common. These facts struck a blow to the veracity of the transaction. By doing so, the interests of small investors were harmed, as these shares had been reserved for them. Thus, a penalty was imposed on the Respondent.

In the appeal filed before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (“**SAT**”), there was no specific order to the effect that the findings of Whole Time Member and the Adjudicating Officer of the SEBI are incorrect. However, order of the Whole Time Member and the Adjudicating Officer of the SEBI was set aside.

**Decision of the Supreme Court**

The Appellant preferred an appeal before the Supreme Court. The Apex Court observed that shares in the IPO had been allotted below market price before being listed through demat accounts with same registered addresses and bearing several inconsistent signatures, thereby denying small investors of their quota of shares, resulting in unjust enrichment. Thus, order of SAT was set aside, and the order of the Whole Time Member and the Adjudicating Officer of the SEBI was upheld.

The Court also observed that the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (“**SCRA**”) which governs the offering of IPO is a special law to regulate the functioning of recognized stock exchanges, and to prevent undesirable transactions in securities, and that therefore, they shall prevail over general provisions contained in Contracts Act, 1872 and Sale of Goods Act, 1930, in matters which are specifically dealt with by SCRA.

[[1]](#_ftnref1) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2252 OF 2010

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/commercialcorporate/securities-contracts-regulation-act-1956-prevails-general-provisions//pdf/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---