---
title: "Strict Compliance with Timelines: The Supreme Court’s Stance on Insolvency Appeals"
date: 2025-05-08
author: "Rahul Sundaram"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/civil/strict-timelines-sc-insolvency-appeals/
---

# Strict Compliance with Timelines: The Supreme Court’s Stance on Insolvency Appeals

Posted On - 8 May, 2025 •

By - [Rahul Sundaram](https://www.indialaw.in/people/rahul-sundaram/ "Posts by Rahul Sundaram")

[![Strict Compliance with Timelines: The Supreme Court's Stance on Insolvency Appeals](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Capture-30.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Capture-30.jpg)

In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed the importance of strict adherence to timelines in insolvency appeals, setting aside an order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The case, *Tata Steel Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Banerjee & Ors.* (Civil Appeal No. 408 of 2023), highlights the legal complexities surrounding the filing of appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and the limitations imposed by the Limitation Act, 1963.

## Background of the Case

The case involves Tata Steel Ltd., a leading steel manufacturer in India, which emerged as the successful resolution applicant for Rohit Ferro-Tech Limited (the Corporate Debtor). Tata Steel’s resolution plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors and subsequently by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Kolkata on April 7, 2022. Raj Kumar Banerjee, a former minority shareholder of the Corporate Debtor, challenged this approval by filing an appeal under Section 61 of the IBC. He also sought condonation of delay for filing the appeal, which was allowed by the NCLAT. Tata Steel Ltd. then appealed to the Supreme Court against the NCLAT’s order.

## Legal Dispute and Rival Contentions

The crux of the legal dispute centred on whether the appeal filed by Raj Kumar Banerjee was within the prescribed limitation period of 30 days, extendable by an additional 15 days under Section 61(2) of the IBC. Tata Steel argued that the appeal was filed beyond the permissible period of 45 days and that the NCLAT erred in applying Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The appellant contended that the last day for filing, May 7, 2022, was a working Saturday for the NCLAT registry, and thus, the benefit of Section 4 did not apply. Tata Steel relied on several Supreme Court judgments, including *V. Nagarajan v. SKS Ispat Powers Limited* and *Kalpraj Dharamshi v. Kotak Investment Advisors Limited*, which emphasized the strict timelines under the IBC.

On the other hand, Raj Kumar Banerjee argued that the appeal was filed within the permissible period, considering the extension under Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963. He contended that the limitation period should commence from April 8, 2022, when the Corporate Debtor informed the stock exchanges about the approval of the resolution plan, not from April 7, 2022, the date of the NCLT order. The respondent also argued that the delay was due to practical constraints, including the failure of the Resolution Professional to comply with SEBI disclosure obligations, which impacted his right to timely information.

## Supreme Court’s Analysis and Decision

The Supreme Court analysed the provisions of the IBC,2016 and the Limitation Act, 1963, along with relevant case law. The court held that the limitation period for filing an appeal under Section 61(2) IBC starts from the date of the NCLT order, not from the date of disclosure to the stock exchanges. The court also held that the benefit of Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963, does not apply when the last day for filing falls on a working Saturday. The court emphasized the strict timelines under the IBC and the limited scope for condonation of delay.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court set aside the NCLAT order condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The court held that the appeal was filed beyond the permissible period of 45 days and that the NCLAT had no power to condone the delay beyond the statutory limit. The appeal was allowed, and the NCLAT order was declared ultra vires. The court emphasised the importance of strict adherence to timelines in statutory appeals to ensure the efficacy and finality of the appellate mechanism.

## Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision in *Tata Steel Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Banerjee & Ors.* reaffirms the importance of strict compliance with timelines in insolvency proceedings. The judgment highlights the court’s commitment to upholding the legislative intent behind the IBC, which aims to ensure timely resolution of insolvency cases. This case serves as a reminder to all stakeholders in insolvency proceedings of the critical need to adhere to prescribed timelines and the limited scope for condonation of delay.

For further details write to [contact@indialaw.in](mailto:contact@indialaw.in)

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/civil/strict-timelines-sc-insolvency-appeals//pdf/)

[Insolvency & Bankruptcy](https://www.indialaw.in/expertise/insolvency-and-bankruptcy-laws/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---