---
title: "Section 138 NI Act and IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court Defines the Boundaries"
date: 2025-03-18
author: "Rahul Sundaram"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/civil/section-138-ni-act-ibc-moratorium-sc/
---

# Section 138 NI Act and IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court Defines the Boundaries

Posted On - 18 March, 2025 •

By - [Rahul Sundaram](https://www.indialaw.in/people/rahul-sundaram/ "Posts by Rahul Sundaram")

[![Section 138 NI Act and IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court Defines the Boundaries](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Capture-6-1.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Capture-6-1.jpg)

The Supreme Court of India recently delivered a significant judgment in the case of Vishnoo Mittal versus M/S Shakti Trading Company, addressing the interplay between insolvency proceedings and criminal prosecutions under the Negotiable Instruments Act.

## Background of the Case

This legal battle arose from a business relationship between Vishnoo Mittal, director of Xalta Food and Beverages Private Limited, and M/S Shakti Trading Company, which served as a super stockist for the corporate entity. The respondent had issued eleven cheques totalling Rs.11,17,326/- to M/S Shakti Trading Company, which were subsequently dishonoured by the bank on 07.07.2018.

## Key Facts

Following the dishonour of these cheques, M/S Shakti Trading Company issued a legal notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on 06.08.2018. Importantly, insolvency proceedings against Xalta Food and Beverages Private Limited had commenced on 25.07.2018, with a moratorium imposed under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). This moratorium typically restricts various legal actions against the corporate debtor during insolvency proceedings.

## Submissions by the Parties

The appellant argued that since the moratorium was imposed before the cause of action under Section 138 of the NI Act had fully matured, the proceedings against him should be quashed. He contended that after the appointment of the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), he no longer had control over the corporate debtor’s assets or bank accounts, making it impossible to fulfil the demand notice requirements.

The respondent relied on the High Court’s previous decision, which had dismissed the appellant’s petition, primarily based on the Supreme Court’s judgment in P. Mohan Raj v. M/S Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd. That case had held that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC applies only to corporate debtors and not to natural persons like the appellant.

## High Court’s Decision

The High Court had dismissed the appellant’s petition under Section 482 of the CrPC, relying on P. Mohan Raj. The court held that since the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC only protected the corporate debtor and not its directors or other natural persons, the proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act could continue against the appellant.

## Legal Provisions and Case Laws Discussed

**The Supreme Court examined several key legal provisions:**

**Section 14 of the IBC:** Which imposes a moratorium preventing various legal actions against the corporate debtor during insolvency proceedings

**Section 138 of the NI Act:** Which criminalizes dishonouring cheques for insufficiency of funds

**Section 482 of the CrPC:** Which grants High Courts inherent powers to quash proceedings in appropriate cases

**Section 17 of the IBC:** Which transfers management of the corporate debtor to the Interim Resolution Professional upon appointment

**The Court also discussed relevant case law, including:**

**P. Mohan Raj v. M/S Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 6 SCC 258:** Which held that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC applies only to corporate debtors

**Jugesh Sehgal v. Shamsher Singh Gogi (2009) 14 SCC 683:** Which explained the ingredients required to establish an offence under Section 138 of the NI Act

## Supreme Court’s Analysis and Final Decision

The Supreme Court carefully distinguished this case from P. Mohan Raj, noting that in the present matter, the cause of action under Section 138 of the NI Act had not fully matured before the moratorium was imposed. The Court emphasized that the appellant, as director, had been suspended from his position upon the appointment of the IRP and thus lacked the capacity to fulfill the demand notice requirements under Section 138 of the NI Act.

The Court held that since the appellant could not have complied with the demand notice due to the moratorium and transfer of control to the IRP, the proceedings under Section 138 should be quashed.

## Conclusion and Implications

This judgment clarifies the relationship between corporate insolvency proceedings and criminal prosecutions against company directors. It establishes that when a moratorium is imposed under the IBC before the cause of action under Section 138 of the NI Act has fully matured, and the director has been suspended from his position, criminal proceedings under the NI Act should be quashed.

The decision has important implications for corporate insolvency proceedings, balancing the rights of creditors with the need for fair treatment of directors during corporate restructuring processes.

For further details write to [contact@indialaw.in](mailto:contact@indialaw.in)

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/civil/section-138-ni-act-ibc-moratorium-sc//pdf/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---