---
title: "NCLAT’s Decision in Phoenix ARC Case: Implications for Secured Creditors’ Security Interest in Liquidation"
date: 2025-04-14
author: "Rahul Sundaram"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/civil/nclats-phoenix-arc-secured-creditors/
---

# NCLAT’s Decision in Phoenix ARC Case: Implications for Secured Creditors’ Security Interest in Liquidation

Posted On - 14 April, 2025 •

By - [Rahul Sundaram](https://www.indialaw.in/people/rahul-sundaram/ "Posts by Rahul Sundaram")

[![NCLAT's Decision in Phoenix ARC Case: Implications for Secured Creditors' Security Interest in Liquidation](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Capture-14-1.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Capture-14-1.jpg)

On 20 March 2025, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) delivered a judgment in the case of Phoenix ARC Private Limited vs. Kuldeep Verma, affirming the decision of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to include the Haldia property in the liquidation estate of KS Oils Limited. The bench, presided over by Justice Ashok Bhushan and Technical Member Barun Mitra, analysed the legal provisions and the conduct of the parties involved, ultimately dismissing Phoenix ARC’s appeal while allowing the successful bidder, Halder Venture Limited, to proceed with the acquisition of the Haldia property.

## Background of the Case

The dispute arose during the liquidation proceedings of KS Oils Limited, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, a secured creditor with a claim of ₹793.45 Crores, asserted its security interest over the Haldia property, a 12.84-acre industrial unit located in Medinipur, West Bengal. In its Form-D filed on 14 April 2021, Phoenix ARC explicitly stated that it was not relinquishing its security interest in the Haldia property. However, on 14 July 2023, the liquidator, Kuldeep Verma, notified Phoenix ARC that the Haldia property had become part of the liquidation estate under Regulation 21A (3) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 (Regulation) for non-payment of dues under section 53 within 90 days. Subsequent sale notices issued by the liquidator led to the auction of the Haldia property to Halder Venture Limited for ₹57.10 Crores on 2 February 2024.

## Legal Provisions at Play

The judgment hinged on the interpretation and application of key provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) and the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016.

Section 52 of the IBC allows secured creditors to realize their security interest during liquidation, while Section 53 prioritizes the distribution of liquidation proceeds. Regulation 21A of the Liquidation Regulations, introduced in 2019, mandates that secured creditors must either relinquish their security interest or comply with specific obligations, including making payments within 90 days of the liquidation commencement date (proportionate share of the CIRP/Liquidation cost and workman dues as per provision of section 53(1)(a) and 53(1)(b)(i) of the IBC. Failure to comply results in the asset becoming part of the liquidation estate as per provisions of the said Liquidation regulation 21A(3).

Regulation 37  requires secured creditors to notify the liquidator of the proposed sale price of their secured assets. Further if any person is willing to buy the secured asset at a higher price the liquidator must inform the secured creditor within 21 days. Further where the liquidator informs the secured creditor of a person willing to buy the secured asset, the secured creditor should sell such secured asset to such buyer.

## Contentions of the Parties

Phoenix ARC contended that it had clearly communicated its intention not to relinquish its security interest in the Haldia property and argued that the liquidator failed to provide an estimate of the required payments under Regulation 21A(2). It also claimed a security interest in an additional 8.02 acres of land, which it asserted should have been handed over to it. Conversely, the liquidator emphasized Phoenix ARC’s non-compliance with Regulation 21A(2) and the validity of the auction process, stressing that Phoenix ARC had not fulfilled its obligations under Regulation 37.

## NCLAT’s Analysis and Decision

The NCLAT upheld the NCLT’s decision, finding that Phoenix ARC had failed to comply with Regulation 21A(2). The appellate tribunal noted that Phoenix ARC neither communicated its proposed sale price to the liquidator nor made the required payments within the stipulated timeframe. The court dismissed Phoenix ARC’s argument regarding the liquidator’s failure to provide an estimate, highlighting that the second proviso of Regulation 21A(2) obligates secured creditors to pay the liquidator’s estimated amount even if the exact liability is uncertain.

The tribunal also addressed Phoenix ARC’s claim over the additional 8.02 acres, concluding that the creditor’s failure to properly document and communicate this claim within the required timeframe rendered it part of the liquidation estate.

## Halder Venture Limited’s Application

The NCLAT further allowed Halder Venture Limited, the successful bidder, to deposit the remaining auction consideration of ₹51.39 Crores along with 12% interest within 30 days. The liquidator was directed to proceed with handing over the Haldia property to Halder Venture upon receipt of the balance amount.

## Conclusion

**T**he NCLAT’s judgment in Phoenix ARC Private Limited vs. Kuldeep Verma emphasises the importance of strict compliance with regulatory obligations by secured creditors during liquidation proceedings. The decision reinforces the principle that failure to adhere to the timelines and requirements of the IBC and associated regulations can result in the loss of security interests. For stakeholders navigating insolvency and liquidation processes, this case serves as a reminder of the need for careful adherence to procedural mandates and timely communication with liquidators. The tribunal’s ruling not only validates the liquidator’s actions but also ensures that the interests of all creditors are balanced within the framework of the law.

For further details write to [contact@indialaw.in](mailto:contact@indialaw.in)

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/civil/nclats-phoenix-arc-secured-creditors//pdf/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---