---
title: "Failure of the Defendant to file Written Statement Does Not Seize its Right to Cross-Examine: Supreme Court"
date: 2024-10-04
author: "Amisha Upadhyay"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/civil/failure-defendant-written-cross-examine/
---

# Failure of the Defendant to file Written Statement Does Not Seize its Right to Cross-Examine: Supreme Court

Posted On - 4 October, 2024 •

By - [Amisha Upadhyay](https://www.indialaw.in/author/amisha-upadhyay/ "Posts by Amisha Upadhyay")

[![Failure of the Defendant to file Written Submission Does Not Seize its Right to Cross-Examine Supreme Court](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Failure-of-the-Defendant-to-file-Written-Submission-Does-Not-Seize-its-Right-to-Cross-Examine-Supreme-Court.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Failure-of-the-Defendant-to-file-Written-Submission-Does-Not-Seize-its-Right-to-Cross-Examine-Supreme-Court.jpg)

The Hon’ble Supreme Court (“**SC**”) recently delivered a noteworthy judgment in the case of **Ranjit Singh & Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.[**[i]**](#_edn1)**, addressing significant concern over an ex parte proceeding and the striking out of a Defendant’s defence.

## Backdrop of the case:

The Appellants, Ranjit Singh and another, were Defendants in a suit filed by the first Respondent and the late Shanti Devi for possession of a property, with allegations that the State of Uttarakhand (first Respondent) was a tenant paying a monthly rent, fixed by the Court in May 1999. The Plaintiffs contended that the Defendants failed to pay rent despite a notice of termination under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882[[ii]](#_edn2), leading to the suit’s initiation.

## Proceedings before the Ld. Trial Court:

Thereafter, the Defendants’ on multiple occasions requested adjournments to file its written statement, the Ld. Trial Court subsequently proceeded ex parte with the suit. As a result of which, the Ld. Trial Court struck out the Defendants’ defense without providing them an opportunity to be heard. The aforesaid decision was made despite a previously scheduled hearing, indicating a breach of natural justice principles.

The Defendants subsequently filed applications to set aside the ex parte order and the order wherein the right to defend was struck off by the Ld. Trial Court. However, the aforesaid applications were rejected, leading to the eventual ex parte decree being passed by the Ld. Trial Court in the suit.

## Analysis by the Hon’ble Supreme Court:

In the present case, the SC categorically stated that striking out a Defendant’s defence without giving an opportunity of hearing, contravenes the essential tenets of justice. The SC, while emphasizing the importance of providing Defendants with a fair opportunity to defend themselves, ruled that the Ld. Trial Court’s actions of proceeding without notice were fundamentally flawed. It articulated that a Defendant retains certain rights, even when a suit is conducted ex parte, including the right to cross-examine witnesses and argue points based on the Plaintiff’s evidence.

Firstly, upon the perusal of the facts and circumstances, the SC noted that, the Ld. Trial Court’s actions were found to be illegal, as it proceeded without giving the Defendants proper notice or an opportunity to be heard. These contravened fundamental principles of natural justice. Secondly, the SC noted that despite the striking out of a defense, Defendants have certain rights, such as the right to cross-examine the witnesses presented by the Plaintiff and to contend that the suit is barred by applicable laws, such as the law of limitation. Thirdly, the SC, highlighted the significance of adhering to procedural fairness, asserting that the lack of notice and opportunity for the Defendants to present their side, constituted a grave miscarriage of justice.

## Author’s Opinion:

In the author’s opinion, the present case reinforces the significance of principles of natural justice, by ensuring that all parties have a fair opportunity to present their case. The SC, ascertained that the Defendants retains the right to cross-examine a Plaintiff’s witnesses, even in ex parte proceedings where a written statement has not been filed.

---

[[i]](#_ednref1) Civil Appeal No.2394/2023.

[[ii]](#_ednref2) **106. Duration of certain leases in absence of written contract or local usage**.– (1) In the absence of a contract or local law or usage to the contrary, a lease of immovable property for agricultural or manufacturing purposes shall be deemed to be a lease from year to year, terminable, on the part of either lessor or lessee, by six months’ notice; and a lease of immovable property for any other purpose shall be deemed to be a lease from month to month, terminable, on the part of either lessor or lessee, by fifteen days’ notice.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the period mentioned in sub-section (1) shall commence from the date of receipt of notice.

(3) A notice under sub-section (1) shall not be deemed to be invalid merely because the period mentioned therein falls short of the period specified under that sub-section, where a suit or proceeding is filed after the expiry of the period mentioned in that sub-section.

(4) Every notice under sub-section (1) must be in writing, signed by or on behalf of the person giving it, and either be sent by post to the party who is intended to be bound by it or be tendered or delivered personally to such party, or to one of his family or servants at his residence, or (if such tender or delivery is not practicable) affixed to a conspicuous part of the property.]

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/civil/failure-defendant-written-cross-examine//pdf/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---