---
title: "Buyer Beware: Court Holds New Management Liable for Unpaid Gratuity in Insolvency Cases"
date: 2025-03-05
author: "Rahul Sundaram"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/civil/court-management-liable-unpaid-gratuity/
---

# Buyer Beware: Court Holds New Management Liable for Unpaid Gratuity in Insolvency Cases

Posted On - 5 March, 2025 •

By - [Rahul Sundaram](https://www.indialaw.in/people/rahul-sundaram/ "Posts by Rahul Sundaram")

[![Buyer Beware: Court Holds New Management Liable for Unpaid Gratuity in Insolvency Cases](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2025-03-05-113145.png)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2025-03-05-113145.png)

The High Court of Calcutta recently delivered a significant judgment in the case of M/s. Stesalit Limited vs. Union of India & Ors., addressing disputes over gratuity payments under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and its interplay with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The case involved a writ petition filed by M/s. Stesalit Limited challenging an order from the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) & Controlling Authority under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which directed the company to pay gratuity dues to its former employee, Shri Arun Roy.  

## Background of the Case  

M/s. Stesalit Limited, a company undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the IBC, had been taken over by a new management. During the CIRP, Shri Arun Roy, a former employee who worked as Manager, Technical Operations, filed a claim for gratuity. This claim was**partially** admitted under the approved Resolution Plan, awarding him Rs. 38,808.43. However, the Assistant Labour Commissioner Central and Controlling Authority under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (Controlling Authority ) passed an order directing the company to pay a significantly higher gratuity amount of Rs. 2,11,154, along with 10% annual interest, citing the extant provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act.  

## Key Legal Issues

The petitioner company argued that the Controlling Authority lacked jurisdiction to entertain the gratuity claim since the matter fell under the IBC’s regulatory framework. They contended that the IBC, as special legislation, overrides the Payment of Gratuity Act. Additionally, they claimed that Shri Arun Roy, as a supervisory employee, could not raise an industrial dispute and that the IBC’s liquidation estate provisions should apply.  

On the other hand, Shri Arun Roy argued that the company had not exhausted appellate remedies before approaching the High Court. They also emphasized that gratuity payments are statutory entitlements under labour law and do not form part of the liquidation estate under Section 36(4)(a)(iii) of the IBC.  

## Court’s Analysis  

The court meticulously examined precedents from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), including cases like Dnyanaba Namdeo Karande vs. Calyx Chemicals and Savan Godiwala vs. Lanco Infratech Limited. These rulings consistently upheld that gratuity dues are excluded from a company’s liquidation estate and must be paid in full to employees, regardless of whether separate funds were maintained.  

The court clarified that while the IBC governs insolvency proceedings, the Payment of Gratuity Act specifically protects employees’ rights. Section 14 of the Gratuity Act grants it overriding authority over conflicting laws, ensuring employees receive their dues. The court also highlighted the principle of Caveat Emptor (buyer beware), stressing that the new management assuming control of the company was obligated to conduct due diligence, including addressing outstanding employee liabilities like gratuity.  

## Judgment and Outcome  

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, ruling in favour of Shri Arun Roy. It affirmed that the Controlling Authority had lawful jurisdiction to adjudicate the gratuity claim since the company remained operational under CIRP and post approval of the resolution plan and had not been liquidated. The court emphasized that gratuity payments are distinct from liquidation assets and must be honoured in full, prioritizing employees’ welfare over other creditors’ claims.  

The court directed M/s. Stesalit Limited to pay the gratuity amount of Rs. 2,11,154 to Shri Arun Roy within 30 days of the order, along with 10% annual interest from the date of his resignation (December 3, 2014). It also noted that the company’s failure to account for gratuity obligations during the insolvency process reflected negligence, but this did not absolve it of its legal duty under the Gratuity Act.  

## Implications of the Judgment  

This ruling reinforces the protection of employees’ statutory rights during corporate insolvency proceedings. It clarifies that even under the IBC, gratuity payments remain a priority and are excluded from liquidation assets. The judgment also highlights the importance of due diligence for entities acquiring companies under insolvency, ensuring they address all employee liabilities proactively.  

In conclusion, the court’s decision balances the objectives of the IBC with the imperative to safeguard workers’ entitlements, setting a precedent for similar cases involving gratuity disputes in insolvency contexts.For further details write to [contact@indialaw.in](mailto:contact@indialaw.in)

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/civil/court-management-liable-unpaid-gratuity//pdf/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---