---
title: "Union of India v. Hariom Projects (P) Ltd."
date: 2026-10-28
author: "Khushboo Rupani"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/union-of-india-v-hariom-projects-section-37-appeal-remittal-arbitral-tribunal/
---

# Union of India v. Hariom Projects (P) Ltd.

Posted On - 28 October, 2026 •

By - [Khushboo Rupani](https://www.indialaw.in/author/khushboo-r/ "Posts by Khushboo Rupani") and [Malavika Sreejith](https://www.indialaw.in/author/malavika-sreejith/ "Posts by Malavika Sreejith")

[![Institutional building under construction with scaffolding and tower cranes at dusk, steel reinforcement bars in the foreground](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/construction-site-interim-relief-arbitration.webp)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/construction-site-interim-relief-arbitration.webp)

*2026 SCC OnLine SC 1996*

## Facts of the Case

- Hariom Projects Pvt. Ltd. (the “Respondent”) held a contract from the Union of India (the “Appellant”) for Administrative and Training Infrastructure (Phase-I) at NDA Khadakwasla. Disputes arose over adjustments, payment calculations and design issues.
- On a writ petition, the High Court directed the Appellant on 12th February 2025 to constitute a Dispute Resolution Board. The Board rejected every claim, encompassing all of the contractor’s grievances regarding those adjustments, payment calculations, and design issues on 26th April 2025.
- Pursuant thereto, the Respondent invoked the [arbitration clause](https://www.indialaw.in/expertise/alternative-dispute-resolution/arbitration/) on 6th May 2025.
- Thereafter, the Appellant issued a show cause notice on 18th May, 2025 and, on 21st July, 2025, demanded Rs 1,46,40,147.32 as an overpayment under a corrected escalation formula.
- In response, the Respondent filed a Section 9 Application before the District Judge, Pune, seeking, among other reliefs, an injunction against cancellation or termination of the contract (the “said application”). The said application was dismissed on 15th October 2025.
- Meanwhile, the Respondent appealed under Section 37 and also filed a [Section 11 petition for appointment of an arbitrator](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/section-11-arbitration-agreements-waiver-parallel/).
- While the appeal was pending, the Appellant terminated the work order on 3rd January 2026.
- The High Court stayed the termination on 5th January 2026 and continued the status quo on 12th January 2026.
- The High Court then suggested that the parties go before an arbitrator.
- By order dated 13th January 2026, the High Court appointed Maj. Gen. R.K. Mattu as sole arbitrator by consent. It also directed that the proceedings before it be remitted to the Tribunal and treated as a Section 17 application. The Appellant challenged only this last direction.

## Issues Framed

- Can a High Court exercising appellate jurisdiction under Section 37(1)(b) of the Act, against the rejection of a Section 9 application, remit the appeal by consent to a subsequently constituted Arbitral Tribunal and direct it to treat the appeal as a Section 17 application?
- Implicit in this is a narrower question: can the parties’ agreement move a statutory appeal to a forum the Act does not give it?

## What the Court Held

- At the outset, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that appellate jurisdiction under Section 37 vests exclusively in the “Court” as defined in [Section 2(1)(e) of the Act](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/arbitration-seat-court-has-jurisdiction-to-execute-arbitration-award/).
- The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that a Tribunal exercising Section 17 powers does not sit in appeal over a Section 9 order. The direction would have made the Tribunal examine the subject of a statutory appeal under a different label. It found the nature and source of the two powers distinct, so they cannot be interchanged by remitting the file.
- Further, the Hon’ble Supreme Court also pointed out the route the Hon’ble High Court should have taken. Once the Tribunal was constituted, it could have granted the Respondent liberty to approach the Tribunal independently under Section 17.
- The Hon’ble Supreme Court further observed that the Section 9 prayer seeking to restrain termination had spent itself following the termination of the work order on 3rd January 2026, notwithstanding the High Court’s subsequent order staying its effect and operation. Any further interim protection would have to be considered in light of subsequent events and the specific relief sought.
- Accordingly, the impugned order was set aside only to the extent of the remittal, and the appointment of the arbitrator was untouched.
- The Tribunal was already seized of all issues, and the parties had signed a Supplementary Agreement on 24th April 2026 allowing the Respondent to complete the work.
- Therefore, the Hon’ble Supreme Court left every other dispute to the Tribunal, with both sides free to raise any contention the law permits. In doing so, the Hon’ble Supreme Court clarified that its order was passed solely to settle the position of law, a point further supported by the Respondent’s senior counsel, who had himself conceded that the remittal direction could not stand.

## Our View

The judgment reaffirms that appellate jurisdiction under Section 37 of the Act vests exclusively in the “Court” as defined in Section 2(1)(e) of the Act and clarifies that a statutory appeal cannot be remitted to an Arbitral Tribunal, even where such remittal is recorded with the consent of the parties. The judgment further clarifies that the powers under Sections 9 and 17 of the Act are distinct in their nature and source, and that an Arbitral Tribunal exercising powers under Section 17 does not sit in appeal over an order passed by a Court under Section 9. Where an Arbitral Tribunal is constituted during the pendency of a Section 37 appeal, the appropriate course is for the Court to grant the party liberty to approach the Tribunal under Section 17, rather than to transfer the appeal to it. Any such application must be considered by the Arbitral Tribunal independently, in light of subsequent events and the specific relief sought.

*Authors: Adv. Khushboo Rupani (Associate Partner); Adv. Malavika Sreejith (Associate); Ruth Gadda(Intern)*

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/union-of-india-v-hariom-projects-section-37-appeal-remittal-arbitral-tribunal/pdf/)

Last Updated On - 28 October, 2026

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

Get IndiaLaw’s legal updates in your Google feed[![Add IndiaLaw as a preferred source on Google](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/google_preferred_source_badge_light_en@2x.png)](https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=https://www.indialaw.in/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---