---
title: "Supreme Court allows Contempt Proceeding against Violation of the Order of Arbitral Tribunal"
date: 2017-07-26
author: "Arundhati Sukhtankar"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/supreme-court-allows-contempt-proceeding-violation-order-arbitral-tribunal/
---

# Supreme Court allows Contempt Proceeding against Violation of the Order of Arbitral Tribunal

Posted On - 26 July, 2017 •

By - [Arundhati Sukhtankar](https://www.indialaw.in/author/arundhati-sukhtankar/ "Posts by Arundhati Sukhtankar")

[![Gavel and legal documents representing the Vishal Kalsaria v. Bank of India case](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/img4.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/img4.jpg)

The Supreme Court in its recent judgment dated 20th July 2017 in *Alka Chandewar v. Shamshul Israr Khan* in Civil Appeal No. 8720 of 2017 held that the Arbitral Tribunal can make representation to High Court for contempt if any of its orders or interim orders are violated.

**Facts**

The respondent in this matter had violated an interim order passed by the arbitrator, under Section17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Act”), restraining the respondent from the sale of flats without obtaining the leave of the arbitral tribunal. The arbitrator, therefore, referred the aforesaid contempt of its interim order to the High Court for passing necessary orders under sec.27 (5) of the Act.

*Sections 27(5) of the Act*

Section 27(5) states that persons failing to attend in accordance with such process, *or making any other default*, or refusing to give their evidence, or guilty of any contempt to the tribunal during the conduct of Arbitral proceedings shall be subject to the like, disadvantages, penalties and punishments by order of the court on the representation of the tribunal as they would incur for the like offences in suits tried before the court.

**Judgment of the Bombay High Court**

The High Court held that Section 27(5) empowers the arbitral tribunal to make representation to the High Court for contempt only if there is any failure in respect of proceeding for taking evidence. The tribunal has no such power in respect of any other order or interim order.

**Argument before the Supreme Court**

The appellant argued that Section 27 did not leave any doubt as to the scope and ambit of the court’s power to punish for contempt of orders made by the tribunal. In the absence of such power an order made by an arbitrator under Section 17 will be toothless, thereby defeating the whole purpose of that section. The respondent, on the other hand, submitted that Section 27 (5) would only apply to contempt while taking evidence and not to any other contempt.

**Judgment/Analysis of the Supreme Court**

The Supreme Court observed that plain reading of Section 27(5) makes it clear that ‘*persons failing to attend in accordance with process*’ fell under a separate category from “*any other default*”. This Section is not confined to failure to attend in accordance with court process but also to any other default during the conduct of the arbitral proceedings.

Further, the Supreme Court also observed that the object of allowing a party to approach the arbitral tribunal instead of the court for interim reliefs would be stultified, if the interim orders passed by such tribunal is not enforceable. Hence, the appeal was allowed setting aside the judgment of the Bombay High Court. The matter was remanded to decide the alleged contempt on facts.

**Remarks**

The Bombay High Court had taken a narrower approach while interpreting Section 27(5). The Delhi High Court in its earlier orders held that a person failing to comply with the order of the tribunal under Section 17 would be deemed to be making “*any other default*” and would be liable for contempt proceedings under Section 27(5) of the Act.[[1]](#_ftn1)

Further, with the insertion of Sub Section 2 to Section17, pursuant to the Arbitration (Amendment) Act of 2015, the cumbersome procedure of the arbitration tribunal approaching the High Court every time for contempt of its orders is no longer required. Such orders were deemed to be orders of the Court for all purposes and can be enforced in the same manner as if they are the order of the Court.

[[1]](#_ftnref1) *Sri Krishnan v. Ananad* 2009 3 Arb LR 447(Del) which was followed in *Indiabulls Financial Services v. Jubilee Plots*, OMP nos 452-453 of 2009 order dated 18.8.2009

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/supreme-court-allows-contempt-proceeding-violation-order-arbitral-tribunal//pdf/)

Last Updated On - 26 July, 2017

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

Get IndiaLaw’s legal updates in your Google feed[![Add IndiaLaw as a preferred source on Google](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/google_preferred_source_badge_light_en@2x.png)](https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=https://www.indialaw.in/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---