---
title: "Supreme Court Echoes Curtailing Power Of The High Court While Entertaining Appeal U/S. 34"
date: 2023-08-18
author: "Aaushi Doshi"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/sc-echoes-limiting-hc-power-in-appeal-us-34-larsen-ac-case/
---

# Supreme Court Echoes Curtailing Power Of The High Court While Entertaining Appeal U/S. 34

Posted On - 18 August, 2023 •

By - [Aaushi Doshi](https://www.indialaw.in/people/adv-aaushi-doshi/ "Posts by Aaushi Doshi") and [Neeli Sandesara](https://www.indialaw.in/author/neeli-sandesara/ "Posts by Neeli Sandesara")

[![SC Echoes Limiting HC Power in Appeal US. 34 - Larsen AC Case](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/SC-Echoes-Limiting-HC-Power-in-Appeal-US.-34-Larsen-AC-Case.png)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/SC-Echoes-Limiting-HC-Power-in-Appeal-US.-34-Larsen-AC-Case.png)

In a recent appeal in the matter of *M/s. Larsen Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Company versus Union of India & Ors.[**[1]**](#_ftn1)*, the division bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“**the SC**”) while capturing the essence of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“**the Act**”) reaffirmed the circumscription of power of the High Court in setting aside of the award which in turn upheld the intent of the legislature while amending the Act.

## **Brief facts**

The parties invoked arbitration to resolve their disputes which arose out of an agreement. In wake of this, an arbitral tribunal was duly constituted and an award was passed. The said award crystallised the interest component and directed the first four respondents to pay interest at the rate of 18% p.a. *pendente lite* and further compound interest on the award in respect of adjudicated claims.

Aggrieved by the award passed by the tribunal, originally, the Respondent-state challenged the award before the District Court, Kanpur under [S. 34 of the Act](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/insolvency-bankruptcy/moratorium-under-ib-code-to-include-proceedings-of-cheque-dishonor-section-34-of-arbitration-act/). As the District Court, could not sit to adjudicate upon the said subject matter and also that the Respondent-state had failed to file any proof of the grounds alleged, rendered the challenge futile. This resulted in refusal to entertain the challenge and dismissal of the same.

By way of a condition precedent as envisaged under the provisions of the Act, the Respondent-state, pre-deposited a sum of Rs. 10,00,000 (Rupees Ten lakhs) as against a sum due to the tune of Rs. 1,82,878.11 (Rupees One lakh eighty-two thousand eight hundred and seventy eight), preferred an appeal before the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad (“**the High Court**”).

## **Proceeding before the High Court**

The judgment passed by the High Court can be broadly summarised and expounded by projecting it into 2 components. Firstly, the High Court by partly allowing the appeal, critically examined and expressed its discontent on the reasoning given by the arbitrator on the aspect of compensation for loss awarded on account of non-issuance of tender document and immobilisation of business. Secondly, the High Court held that the interest rate of 18% p.a. awarded during *pendente lite* cannot be awarded and therefore reduced the rate of interest to 9% p.a. With regards to the residuary part of the award, the Hon’ble High Court deemed it prudent to not interfere.  

## **Summary of contentions raised before the SC**

 The Appellant, by confining the scope of appeal before the SC, solely urges on the point of modification/reduction in the interest component, as ordered by the High Court.

The counsel for the Appellant submitted that the Ld. Arbitrator had at the time of passing an award, already reduced the interest rate to 18% p.a. as against the original claim of 24% p.a. In advancement of the said contention, the counsel highlighted that as per the erstwhile regime for awarding interest that prevailed prior to the amendment under S.31(7)(b) of the Act, the High Court erred in reducing the statutory interest rate of 18% and that the said interest rate is justifiable as stated in the judgment passed in *Shahi vs. State of U.P. & Ors.[**[2]**](#_ftn2)*

Moreover, the counsel also cited a relevant clause of the General Conditions of Contract which prescribed that the award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on both the parties.

Conversely, the counsel for the Respondent-state while justifying the reduction of interest component and disallowance of awarding damages/compensation, submitted that the High Court had taken an all-encompassing view by considering the relevant provisions of the Act and the Indian Contract Act, 1872. In furtherance of his arguments, the Respondent-state relied upon the judgments passed in *Oriental Structural Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Kerala[**[3]**](#_ftn3) and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh v. Kalsi Construction Company[**[4]**](#_ftn4)* wherein the awarded rate of interest was reduced to less than 18% p.a. by the SC.

## **Moot Point**

Whether the High Court has erred in modifying the arbitral award by reducing the interest from compound interest 18% to 9% simple interest per annum?

## **SC’s Ruling**

The SC, while considering the timeline of arbitration proceedings, held that as the arbitration proceedings commenced after the Act came into effect, the tribunal and the award passed, shall indisputably, be subjected to the provisions of the 1996 Act. Therefore, in view of the amended S.31(7) of the Act, the High Court may have averted to interfere with the arbitrator’s finding on the interest awarded.

The SC, while distinguishing the unamended Act, emphasised on restriction and lack of power to modify the award and on its ability to solely set aside the award partially or wholly. The SC while delving into the parliamentary intent to omit the power to modify, held that the extremely circumscribed jurisdiction of the SC allows the court to interfere with an award only on the ground of patent illegality.

The SC, while setting aside the modification given by the High Court, reinstated rate of interest awarded by the arbitrator for past, *pendente lite* and future. Taking into account the aforesaid factual backdrop, the SC marshalled the Respondent-state to pay the dues within the stipulated timeline and accordingly, disposed of the appeal.

---

[[1]](#_ftnref1) Civil Appeal No(s). 3798 of 2023

[[2]](#_ftnref2) [2019] 11 SCR 640

[[3]](#_ftnref3) [2021] 4 SCR 137

[[4]](#_ftnref4) (2019) 8 SCC 726

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/sc-echoes-limiting-hc-power-in-appeal-us-34-larsen-ac-case//pdf/)

Last Updated On - 18 August, 2023

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

Get IndiaLaw’s legal updates in your Google feed[![Add IndiaLaw as a preferred source on Google](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/google_preferred_source_badge_light_en@2x.png)](https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=https://www.indialaw.in/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---