---
title: "MATTERS CAN BE REFERRED TO ARBITRATION UNDER MSMED ACT, THOUGH THERE IS NO PRIOR ARBITRATION AGREEMENT"
date: 2022-06-16
author: "Supriya Bhosale"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/matters-can-be-referred-to-arbitration-under-msmed-act-though-there-is-no-prior-arbitration-agreement/
---

# MATTERS CAN BE REFERRED TO ARBITRATION UNDER MSMED ACT, THOUGH THERE IS NO PRIOR ARBITRATION AGREEMENT

Posted On - 16 June, 2022 •

By - [Supriya Bhosale](https://www.indialaw.in/people/supriya-bhosale/ "Posts by Supriya Bhosale") and [Asav Rajan Arora](https://www.indialaw.in/people/asav-rajan-arora/ "Posts by Asav Rajan Arora")

[![|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/19060165_1391425387571857_5252963044412178685_n-1.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/19060165_1391425387571857_5252963044412178685_n-1.jpg)

The Punjab and Haryana High Court bench comprising Justice Lisa Gill in a recent judgment[1](#sdfootnote1sym) held that even though there is no [arbitration](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/) agreement between the parties, the dispute can be referred to arbitration as per Section 18 of the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“[MSMED Act](https://samadhaan.msme.gov.in/WriteReadData/DocumentFile/MSMED2006act.pdf)”).

**Facts of the Case**

The petitioner in the case, failed to clear dues for the goods supplied to him by the respondent in the year 2016, for which a claim was filed by the respondent to the Haryana Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (“HMSEFC”) for an amount of Rs. 14,01,505/-. The HMSEFC referred the parties for arbitration by appointing a Sole Arbitrator.

Against this a petition was filed before the Punjab And Haryana High Court by the petitioner, under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“A&C Act”), read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petition demanded the termination of the Sole Arbitrator.The petitioner contended that no specified procedure of conciliation was followed as per MSMED Act before the case was referred for arbitration.

The petitioner contended that he had filed an application under Section 12 of the Arbitration Act before the Sole Arbitrator seeking valid disclosure from the learned Arbitrator. Petitioner further contended that the present petition has been filed on the grounds that the conduct of the Arbitrator is arbitrary and disclosure regarding independence and impartiality of the Arbitrator is imperative as per Section 12 of the Arbitration Act. Also, an objection was raised in the said application before the Arbitrator by the petitioner that primarily there existed no arbitration agreement between the parties and hence it should not be allowed for the matter to be referred to arbitration. The petition averred that the Sole Arbitrator dismissed the application.

Learned counsel for the petitioner also argued that Section18 (3) MSMED Act, provides for referral of the dispute to any institution or center for arbitration, therefore referral to the Sole Arbitrator is illegal.

The respondent contended that it was registered under MSMED Act and it requested the assistance of HMSEFC for the payments due by the petitioner. HMSEFC directed the petitioner to pay the dues to the respondent. Later, HMSFEC referred the matter to the Sole Arbitrator, due to failure on the petitioner’s part to pay the remaining amount. The respondent further argued that a prior arbitration agreement between the parties was not required for them to be able to seek the help of HMSEFC as per the MSMED Act.

Respondent further submitted that the petitioner was merely trying its level best to delay the proceedings in one way or the other and defeat the very purpose of the MSMED Act.

**Observations of the court**

The Court referred the provisions of the Section 15, 16, 17 of the MSMED Act.Section 18(1) of the MSMED Act provides that any party to a dispute may make a reference to the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEF). Under Section 18(2), the MSEFC shall either itself conduct conciliation proceedings in the matter or it may seek the assistance of any institution or centre. Section 18(3) provides that where the conciliation initiated under Section 18(2) is not successful, the MSEFC may either itself take up the dispute for arbitration or refer the matter to any institution or centre for arbitration.

The Court further observed that a bare perusal of these provisions clearly indicates that the respondent who was registered under the MSMED Act, at the relevant time was entitled to approach the HMSEFC under the MSMED Act for redressal of its grievance.The Court observed that the petitioner did not challenge the appointment of the Arbitrator by the HMSEFC.

Citing the Case of **M/s Silpi industries etc., Vs. Kerela State Road Transport Corporation and another** the court noted*“It is specifically held that provisions of the MSMED Act being a Special Act shall prevail and have overriding effect vis-a-vis the Arbitration Act.”*

The court further added that *“Even in a case where exists an agreement between the parties for the resolution of disputes by Arbitration, if a seller is covered under the MSMED Act, the seller is at liberty to approach the competent authority to make its claim and agreement, if any, between the parties is to be ignored in view of the statutory obligations and mechanism provided under the MSMED Act. The counterclaim was also held to be permissible by the buyer. Section 18 of the MSMED Act starts with a non-obstante clause…”*

The court added that, therefore, the argument that proceedings are not maintainable in the absence of an arbitral clause is devoid of any merit and hence rejected.

The court concluded by stating that *“In respect to the argument that no conciliation etc., was carried out, it is to be reiterated that order, whereby the Sole Arbitrator was appointed, has never been subjected to challenge by the petitioner.”*

Lastly, the court noted that the remedy of the petitioner is to clearly wait for the award and avail of its remedies thereafter. It dismissed the petition by stating that petition was devoid of any merit.

[1](#sdfootnote1anc) M/s SGM Packaging Industries versus M/s Goyal Plywood LLP

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/matters-can-be-referred-to-arbitration-under-msmed-act-though-there-is-no-prior-arbitration-agreement//pdf/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---