---
title: "Delhi High Court reiterates its findings on what constitutes non est filing for the purposes of calculating period of limitation."
date: 2023-02-08
author: "Aaushi Doshi"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/delhi-high-court-reiterates-its-findings-on-what-constitutes-non-est-filing-for-the-purposes-of-calculating-period-of-limitation/
---

# Delhi High Court reiterates its findings on what constitutes non est filing for the purposes of calculating period of limitation.

Posted On - 8 February, 2023 •

By - [Aaushi Doshi](https://www.indialaw.in/people/adv-aaushi-doshi/ "Posts by Aaushi Doshi") and [Neeli Sandesara](https://www.indialaw.in/author/neeli-sandesara/ "Posts by Neeli Sandesara")

[![|ndustrial Tribunal: Supreme Court](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/19060165_1391425387571857_5252963044412178685_n-1.jpg)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/19060165_1391425387571857_5252963044412178685_n-1.jpg)

### **Introduction**

The [High Court of Delhi](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/), in a recent judgement re-iterated the concept of *non-est* filing in Ambrosia Corner House Private Limited V. Hangro S Foods[1](#sdfootnote1sym). The Court laid out instances that would constitute *non-est*filing while encouraging courts to adopt liberal approach to define the same. The Court also held that as there are no clear and definite guidelines to ascertain such filing, as that would largely depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case at hand.

### **Facts of the case:**

The Petition was filed challenging the arbitral award dated March 14, 2022 under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“**the Act**”). As per Section 34(3) of the [Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/), the timeline for filing petition expired on 13th June, 2022. The Court was closed for summer vacation between 4th June, 2022 till 1st July, 2022; for the purpose of limitation the Court was deemed to have re-opened on 4th July, 2022. The first attempt to file the Petition was made on 4th July, 2023, however, the same was marked as defective by the Registry.

Thereafter, the Petitioner re-filed it on 26th, 27th and 29th July, 2022. However, owing to certain further defects, the said petition was returned for the purpose of re-filing.

Lastly, the petition that was filed on August 1, 2022 was admitted.

### **Contentions**

The learned counsel for the Respondent raised the preliminary objection that the said petition is not maintainable as it is filed beyond the prescribed period of limitation stipulated under S. 34(3) of the said Act and hence submitted that such filing was *non est.*He further submitted that as the petition was eventually filed on July 26, 2022, the said date shall be considered as the date of filing of the petition and the Petitioner cannot take the benefit of Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Further, the Petitioner did not file an application seeking condonation of delay. Additionally, he contended that the filing was without a copy of the impugned arbitral award or the documents in support for challenge. The Petitioner also did not attest the affidavit in support through Oath Commissioner.

The learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that the petition is within the prescribed period of limitation under S. 34(3) as it was filed on the date of re-opening of the said Court after summer vacation which was July 4, 2022 and that petition contained complete particulars and grounds of challenge of the award. Further, the petition was signed on each page by the Director of the petitioner company and by the counsel, who had filed *vakalatnama*.

### **Observations of the Court**

The Court has placed reliance on the decisions passed by the said Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in *Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. V. Joint Venture of M/s. Sai Rama Engineering Enterprise & M/s. Megha Engineering & Infrastructure Limited (MEIL)[2](#sdfootnote2sym)*and *Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Air India[3](#sdfootnote3sym).*

Taking into consideration the judgements, that laid out certain instances that would constitute *non est* filing. Such instances would *inter alia* include a petition that is filed without the signatures of either party or its authorised signatories or not accompanied with a copy of the impugned arbitration award or does not contain material particulars. That facts of each case would determine whether the filing is *non est* or not.

Further, the Court observed that the petition dated 4th July, 2022 was the same as the petition filed on the July 26, 2022. The said petition was also signed by the authorised signatories of the Petitioner on each page along with a duly filed *vakalatnama* of the learned counsel of the Petitioner. In addition to the compliance as stated above, the Petitioner along with his petition dated 4th July, 2022 attempted (and later re-attempted on July 26, 2022) to file separately all the requisite documents including the impugned arbitral award in accordance with the Delhi High Court (Original) Side Rules, 2018. In light of the above, the Court held that the petition filed said July 4, 2022 cannot be held as *non est*. That at best, the petitioner committed an error in not filing the documents in a separate folder.

With respect to the issue of limitation, the Court held that as the Petitioner attempted to file the petition on 4th July, 2022, that is the date of re-opening of the Court, benefit of S. 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963 cannot be denied and hence the petition filed on the said date is within the period of limitation stipulated within Section 34(3) of the Act.

Accordingly, the objection of the Respondent on the petition being barred by provisions of Section 34 (3) of the Act was rejected.

[1](#sdfootnote1anc) 2023 SCC OnLine Del 517

[2](#sdfootnote2anc) 2019 SCC OnLine Del 10456

[3](#sdfootnote3anc) 2019 SCC OnLine Del 11634

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---