---
title: "Delhi High Court On Scope Of Arbitrability Of Disputes Arising Out Of An Insurance Claim, When The Claim Is Partially Rejected"
date: 2023-06-02
author: "Krutik Veera"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/delhi-high-court-landmark-ruling-scope-of-insurance-claim-disputes-partial-rejections/
---

# Delhi High Court On Scope Of Arbitrability Of Disputes Arising Out Of An Insurance Claim, When The Claim Is Partially Rejected

Posted On - 2 June, 2023 •

By - [Krutik Veera](https://www.indialaw.in/author/krutik-veera/ "Posts by Krutik Veera") and [Neeli Sandesara](https://www.indialaw.in/author/neeli-sandesara/ "Posts by Neeli Sandesara")

[![Delhi High Court On Scope Of Arbitrability Of Disputes Arising Out Of An Insurance Claim](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Delhi-High-Court-On-Scope-Of-Arbitrability-Of-Disputes-Arising-Out-Of-An-Insurance-Claim-When-The-Claim-Is-Partially-Rejected.png)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Delhi-High-Court-On-Scope-Of-Arbitrability-Of-Disputes-Arising-Out-Of-An-Insurance-Claim-When-The-Claim-Is-Partially-Rejected.png)

## **Introduction**

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court **(“HC”)** in a recent judgment of *Shivalaya Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. National Insurance Company Ltd.[**[1]**](#_ftn1),*deliberated on the arbitrability and maintainability of a policyholder’s right to invoke arbitration in cases wherein the claim is partially allowed. On the said point, the HC held that the same shall be determined by the arbitral tribunal upon commencement of the arbitration proceedings, therefore, leaving it out of the ambit of the judiciary to decide it at the pre-reference stage that is at the stage of an entertaining application under S.11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”).

The said judgment further distinguishes between the rejection of the claim in toto and the denial of a partial claim of the policyholder by the insurer for the purpose of determining the scope of reference to arbitration.

## **Brief Facts**

The Petitioner availed the “*Contract All Risk*” policy (“**the Policy**”) of the Respondent. Thereafter, the Petitioner made a claim to the Respondent under the Policy which was partially accepted by the Respondent. The Petitioner, in accordance with the terms of the Policy, issued a notice invoking the arbitration clause in order to claim the rejected balance amount from the Respondent. The Respondent vide its reply to the said notice refused to refer the dispute to arbitration on the reasoning that the same has been settled. In view of the aforesaid facts, a petition under [section 11](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/limitation-period-for-filing-application-under-section-11-of-arbitration-act-governed-by-article-137-of-limitation-act/) of the Act came to be filed before the HC seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

## **Submissions Made By The Parties**

The Respondent’s counsel, opposing the Petition, relied on the arbitration clause Policy which stated that any dispute or difference between the parties that may arise with respect to the quantum of claim to be paid, presuming that liability is admitted, shall be referred to arbitration to be governed in accordance with the Act. Therefore, the Respondent’s counsel contended that as per the terms of the Policy, any dispute regarding the liability is outside the scope of the arbitration clause.

In support of his contention, the Respondent’s Counsel further relies on judgments passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in *Kohinoor Steel Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bajaj Allianz Insurance Company[**[2]**](#_ftn2),*the Hon’ble Supreme Court in *Vidya Drolia and Others Vs. Durga Trading Corporation[**[3]**](#_ftn3)*and *Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. Vs. NCC Ltd[**[4]**](#_ftn4).*Further, the Respondent’s counsel submitted that the Petitioner made a claim under various heads of the Policy including “muck removal”, however as per the Suveryor’s Report appointed by the Respondent, “muck removal” was not covered under the Policy. Taking into consideration the aforesaid, the liability for the claim is disputed and not the quantum of the claim. The Petitioner’s counsel, in light of the contents of the aforesaid report, disputed its interpretation.

## **Decision**

The HC limited the scope of judicial intervention at the stage of an entertaining application under section 11 of the Act by holding that the question of whether a particular head is or is not included in the Policy for the purpose of making a claim can be adjudicated by the arbitral tribunal once the proceedings commence.

Having stated this, for the purpose of removing the deadwood, the court quoted relevant excerpts of the judgment in Vidya Drolia carving out an exception to the rule above wherein a claim is ex-facie barred or is demonstrably non-arbitrable. Further, the HC opined and held that in such a scenario, reference to arbitration could not be made impermissible as the interpretation of the arbitration clause is ambiguous.

In consideration of the aforesaid, the HC allowed the petition appointing a former judge of the HC as a sole arbitrator and that the arbitration proceedings be administered by the Delhi International Arbitration Center, Delhi High Court.

---

[[1]](#_ftnref1)2023:DHC:3753

[[2]](#_ftnref2)2011 SCC OnLine Cal 3252

[[3]](#_ftnref3)(2021) 2 SCC 1

[[4]](#_ftnref4)(2023) 2 SCC 539

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/delhi-high-court-landmark-ruling-scope-of-insurance-claim-disputes-partial-rejections//pdf/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---