---
title: "Partner of Partnership Firm Can’t Solely Refer A Dispute To Arbitration In Absence of Other Partners: Bombay High Court"
date: 2024-01-03
author: "Shivangi Dubey"
url: https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/bombay-hc-partner-alone-cant-arbitrate-dispute/
---

# Partner of Partnership Firm Can’t Solely Refer A Dispute To Arbitration In Absence of Other Partners: Bombay High Court

Posted On - 3 January, 2024 •

By - [Shivangi Dubey](https://www.indialaw.in/author/shivangi-dubey/ "Posts by Shivangi Dubey") and [Aaushi Doshi](https://www.indialaw.in/people/adv-aaushi-doshi/ "Posts by Aaushi Doshi")

[![Partner of Partnership Firm Can't Solely Refer A Dispute To Arbitration In Absence of Other Partners: Bombay High Court](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Bombay-HC-Partner-Alone-Cant-Arbitrate-Dispute.png)](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/Bombay-HC-Partner-Alone-Cant-Arbitrate-Dispute.png)

The High Court of Bombay (HC) in *Shailesh Ranka and Ors. v. Windsor Machines Limited & Ors.[**[i]**](#_edn1)* held that a firm’s partner cannot solely decide and initiate arbitration proceedings without the consent of the other partners.

The Bench of Justice Manish Pitale highlighted that the implied authority bestowed on the partners cannot be invoked considering the bar provided under Section 19(2)(a) of the Partnership Act, 1932 (Act), to refer a business-related dispute to Arbitration without the consent of the remaining partners. This provision specifies that unless there is an agreement between the parties in contrast, a partner under his implied authority cannot refer a dispute to arbitration.

## **Facts of the case**

Shailesh Ranka and Ors. (applicants) and respondent no.2, were the partners of R-Cube Energy Storage Systems LLP (R-Cube Energy). They had entered into an investment agreement with Windsor Machines Limited (respondent no.1). As per the agreement, the respondent No.1 had to invest Rs.16.5 crores towards development of technology obtained by R-Cube Energy from Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies and Systems (Fraunhofer Institute). That the initial amount was invested by respondent No.1 and it defaulted subsequently.

The applicants had to face market embarrassments and the threat of legal action from Fraunhofer Institute. This led to a dispute between the applicants and respondent no.1. The applicants made attempts to communicate with respondent no.1. Consequently, the applicants appointed a neutral person in accordance with clause 24 of the investment agreement and asked respondent no.1 to appoint its neutral person for conducting dispute resolution meetings. However, respondent no.1 failed to do so and hence, the applicants sent a notice invoking arbitration proceedings.

## **Objections of Respondent No. 1**

1. The notice invoking the arbitration was issued only on behalf of the applicants, excluding another partner i.e. respondent no.2, and hence the dispute resolution mechanism had not been properly activated.
2. It was specifically mentioned in the investment agreement that pre-arbitration steps to be taken by referring the dispute to neutral persons for amicable settlement before invoking arbitration, which was not fulfilled.

## **Analysis by the High Court**

Clause 24 of the agreement pertaining to dispute resolution the Court elaborated that a two-tier procedure was prescribed for resolution of dispute:

1. Firstly, by referring the dispute to neutral persons, one each to be appointed by the parties;
2. On failure of this procedure, secondly, arbitration proceedings could be invoked through issuing a written notice.

While considering the first objection of respondent no.1, regarding the exhaustion of the dispute resolution mechanism. The HC stated that the applicants had appointed a neutral person and communicated the same to respondent no.1. However, respondent no. 1 failed to appoint its neutral person and hence, it cannot claim the non-exhaustion of the prescribed process.

On the second objection of respondent no.1, the HC observed that the notice of arbitration was issued by the applicants on behalf of the firm, but the other partner’s (respondent no.2) consent was not obtained. An arbitration notice issued by one of the partners without other partners’ consent is invalid hence it rendered the application appointing the arbitrator also invalid.

The Court clarified that business-related dispute of a partnership firm cannot be referred to arbitration solely by one partner, in absence of the other partners’ consent. The partner’s implied authority does not extend to refer the dispute to arbitration as per Section 19(2)(a) of the Act.

It added that *“A bare reading of Section 19(2)(a) of the Partnership Act shows that implied authority of a partner in a partnership firm does not empower such a partner to submit a dispute relating to the business of the firm, to arbitration. In other words, one set of partners cannot submit a dispute relating to business of the partnership firm to arbitration, in the absence of the other partners joining them.”*

On the above findings, the HC dismissed the Section 11 application filed under the Arbitration Act, highlighting that a defective notice could not give rise to a cause of action.

The Court clarified that implied authority bestowed on the partners under the Partnership Act cannot be invoked to refer a dispute to the Arbitration in absence of the remaining partners.

---

[[i]](#_ednref1) **(L) No. 38198 of 2022**

Disclaimer - This article is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal counsel in relation to their individual circumstances.

[Download PDF](https://www.indialaw.in/blog/arbitration-and-conciliation/bombay-hc-partner-alone-cant-arbitrate-dispute//pdf/)

---

# IndiaLaw LLP — Offices & Contact Details

---

## General Contact

| | |
|---|---|
| **Website** | https://www.indialaw.in |
| **Primary email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Primary phone** | +91 836-9995919 |
| **Contact form** | https://www.indialaw.in/connect/ |
| **Careers (separate channel)** | https://www.indialaw.in/careers/ |


---

## All Offices (9 locations across 8 cities)

### 1. Mumbai — Registered Office & Head Office (Apeejay Chambers)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Apeejay Chambers, Ground Floor, Wallace Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-6924-7400](tel:02269247400) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate · IP |
| **Notes** | The HQ. 5 partners based here. Handles PAN-India litigation, arbitration, corporate, banking, IP and real estate practice. Largest team across all offices. |

### 2. Mumbai — Non-Litigation Office (Excelsior, Fort)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 4th Floor, New Excelsior Theatre Pvt. Ltd., Amrit Keshav Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 |
| **Phone** | [022-697-40500](tel:022-697-40500) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/mumbai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Non-litigation only — consultations, negotiations, transactional work |
| **Notes** | Opened 2024. Litigation and arbitration remain at the Apeejay Chambers head office. |

### 3. Delhi

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Flat No. 1107 & 1108, Prakashdeep Building, Tolstoy Marg, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/delhi/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Arbitration · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Corporate · Banking · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | 3 partners based here. Located near the Supreme Court of India, Delhi High Court and other appellate bodies. |

### 4. Kolkata

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Centre Point Building, Room No. 214, 2nd Floor, Premises No. 21, Hemanta Basu Sarani, Opp. Great Eastern Hotel, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata – 700 001, West Bengal |
| **Phone** | [+91 33 4813 1001](tel:+913348131001) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/kolkata/ |
| **Practice focus** | Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Commercial & Civil Litigation · Arbitration · Banking Litigation · Real Estate · Labour & Employment · Consumer |
| **Notes** | Advises banks, NBFCs, MSMEs and corporates on transactions and dispute resolution. Works in close coordination with the Mumbai HO. |

### 5. Chennai

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | GF-A, 19 Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/chennai/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Full-fledged office with experienced legal team. Supported by Mumbai HO. |

### 6. Bengaluru (Bangalore)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | INDIALAW LLP, No. 7 Chinnaswamy Mudaliar Road, Shivaji Nagar, Bangalore – 560 051 |
| **Phone** | [080-4167-2444](tel:08041672444) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/bengaluru/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate · Family Laws · Labour |
| **Notes** | Located near Bangalore High Court. Handles corporate, commercial, banking and matrimonial disputes. |

### 7. Hyderabad

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | 403, 4th Floor, Sanatana Ecstasy Building, beside Tanishq Show Room, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad – 500 029, Telangana |
| **Phone** | [040-6666-5166](tel:04066665166) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/hyderabad/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Banking · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Particularly well known for complex banking matters and real estate transactions. |

### 8. Cochin (Kochi)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | Second Floor, Pulikkal Building, K.K. Padmanabhan Road, Ernakulam North – 682 018, Kerala |
| **Phone** | [0484-3583961](tel:04843583961) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/cochin/ |
| **Practice focus** | Litigation · Insolvency & Bankruptcy · Real Estate |
| **Notes** | Commercial disputes, property litigation, financial-claim arbitrations and real estate transactions. |

### 9. Noida (NCR)

| | |
|---|---|
| **Address** | No. 16 & 17, Silver Offices, 17th Floor, Wave One, Sector 18, Noida – 201 301 |
| **Phone** | (general line: +91 836-9995919) |
| **Email** | contact@indialaw.in |
| **Page** | https://www.indialaw.in/noida/ |
| **Practice focus** | Aviation · Insurance · Mergers & Acquisitions · Corporate |
| **Office head** | **Mr. Dinesh Gupta** (joined August 2025 to lead and expand the corporate practice) |
| **Notes** | Newest office. Sector-focused on highly regulated industries serving NCR-based clients. |

---

## Quick-Dial Phone List

| Office | Phone |
|---|---|
| Mumbai HO (Apeejay) | 022-6924-7400 |
| Mumbai Excelsior | 022-697-40500 |
| Kolkata | +91 33 4813 1001 |
| Bengaluru | 080-4167-2444 |
| Hyderabad | 040-6666-5166 |
| Cochin | 0484-3583961 |
| **General / Marketing line** | **+91 836-9995919** |

Delhi, Chennai and Noida route through the general number.

---

## Social Channels

- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/indialaw
- X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/Indialawmumbai
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indialawllp/
- Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/indialawllp

---