Supreme Court Upholds that Dues of Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs, Department of Revenue to be paid according to the Waterfall Mechanism

In a notable Judgment dated 30.10.2023 in the case of Principal Commissioner of Customs V Rajendra Prasad Tak & Ors[1], the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the dues of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes

Rights on An Immovable Property transferred Under an Agreement To Sell are not Conveyance Of Ownership: Supreme Court

Rights on An Immovable Property transferred Under an Agreement To Sell are not Conveyance Of Ownership: Supreme Court

In a recent judgment, passed in the matter of Munishamappa v.M.Rama Reddy and Ors.,[1]the Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC”) clarified the fundamental principle of the conveyancing of immovable property, under section 54 of the Transfer of

Magistrate Holds no Power to Modify Its Previous Cognizance Order on Filing of Protest Petition: Supreme Court

Magistrate Holds no Power to Modify Its Previous Cognizance Order on Filing of Protest Petition: Supreme Court

In a notable judgment, the Supreme Court held that the Judicial Magistrate cannot entertain a protest petition against its own order wherein the cognizance has already been taken on a final report. Ramakant Singh and

Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 will be applicable only when a defence is raised under Section 30(2)(e) of the Act, followed by a plea of the invalidity of mark: Delhi High Court

The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi[1] (“HC”) recently dismissed an application moved by International Great Brands LLC, under section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“TM Act”) against Parle’s ‘FABIO’ mark.The HC dismissed the

Supreme Court: Executing Court to Consider Questions Limited to Execution of Decree

Supreme Court: Executing Court to Consider Questions Limited to Execution of Decree

In a recent decision[i], the Hon’ble Supreme Court (“SC“)[ii], emphasized that the higher courts hold responsibility to rectify errors in order to ensure efficient administration of justice. The SC further clarified that according to section

Unfold Nuances of Section 9 of Arbitration Act: A Case Study of Vivek Jain v. PrepLadder Pvt. Ltd., Delhi High Court 

Unfold Nuances of Section 9 of Arbitration Act: A Case Study of Vivek Jain v. PrepLadder Pvt. Ltd., Delhi High Court 

It was interpreted by the Delhi High Court that the Court exercising its powers under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996(‘Arbitration Act’) to secure the amount in dispute or to order attachment

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 76