Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 will be applicable only when a defence is raised under Section 30(2)(e) of the Act, followed by a plea of the invalidity of mark: Delhi High Court

Thursday November 16, 2023. BY Brian Noronha and Shivangi Dubey | Civil

The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi[1] (“HC”) recently dismissed an application moved by International Great Brands LLC, under section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“TM Act”) against Parle’s ‘FABIO’ mark.The HC dismissed the

L&T Realty v/s L&T Raintree Boulevard Welfare Association:

Thursday October 20, 2022. BY Ms. Kirti Vagal, Mr. Chitrang Gamot and co-authored by Nidhi Singh. | Intellectual Property Rights

ALOTTEES NOT PERMITTED TO USE NAME OF PROJECT HAVING TRADEMARK OF PROMOTER         vs      On 11th October 2022, the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the matter of L&T Realty Developers

CHEERS INDIAN MSME FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (‘IP’)

Tuesday June 22, 2021. BY Nayan Rawal | Intellectual Property Rights

On 26th April of every year is celebrated as World Intellectual Property Day.  This year World Intellectual Property Organisation (‘WIPO’) which is the inter-governmental agency administrating the Intellectual Property for the whole world, situated in

IP WAIVER FOR COVID-19 VACCINES, TRIPS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS

Tuesday June 22, 2021. BY Nayan Rawal | Intellectual Property Rights

Points and objectives of this blogs and article. 1. Letter to WTO by India and South Africa in October 2020 to propose certain IP and TRIPS Waiver for COVID-19 related drugs and       

Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Tuesday March 1, 2016. BY Aishwarya Jain | Intellectual Property Rights

Introduction: Ending an eight-year long litigation over a patent, the US Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit held that Cisco Systems, Inc. (herein after “Cisco”) had not infringed WiFi technology patent of Commil USA, LLC

Lal Babu Priyadarshi v. Amritpal Singh – Trademark over name of religious books

Tuesday December 1, 2015. BY | Intellectual Property Rights

By Shalini Singh and J. Mandakini Introduction In the case of Lal Babu Priyadarshi vs. Amritpal Singh[1], the Supreme Court has considered the question of registration of names of holy books as trademarks. Facts Lal

1 2