![Article 137 of Limitation Act](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/arbitration-1.jpg)
Admissibility of Arbitration Clause in Insufficient Stamped Agreement
A three bench judge of the Supreme Court comprising of CJI S.A. Bobde, Justice BR Gavai and Justice Surya Kant in a recent judgment M/s Dharmaratnakara Rai Bahadur Arcot Narainswamy Mudaliar Chattram & Other Charities
![Article 137 of Limitation Act](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/arbitration-1.jpg)
ARBITRATION SEAT COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO EXECUTE ARBITRATION AWARD
The Bombay High Court in a recent judgment considered whether a Court[1], within whose jurisdiction arbitration takes place, which also has supervisory jurisdiction over arbitration (“Arbitral Court”), can entertain application for execution of arbitral award,
![Article 137 of Limitation Act](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/arbitration-1.jpg)
Court Can’t Appoint Arbitrator, if the Agreement containing arbitration clause is inadequately stamped
The Hon’ble Supreme Court presided by a division bench of J. R.F. Nariman and J. Vineet Saran in Garware Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd.[1] examined the effect of an arbitration clause
![Article 137 of Limitation Act](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/arbitration-1.jpg)
Applications for interim reliefs and appointment of arbitrator are maintainable even if arbitration agreement is insufficiently stamped
The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court in a recent judgment in Gautam Landscapes Private Limited Vs Shailesh S Shah and others[1] held that a court can entertain applications under section 9 of the
![Article 137 of Limitation Act](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/arbitration-1.jpg)
Supreme Court Settles Jurisdictional Issues in execution of arbitration awards
In a much awaited judgment, the Supreme Court bench consisting of J. Chelameswar and J. Sanjay Kishan Kaul in Sundaram Finance Limited v. Abdul Samad & Anr[1] resolved a long standing debate as to whether
![Article 137 of Limitation Act](https://www.indialaw.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/arbitration-1.jpg)
No Separate application is required, when the jurisdiction of the court is questioned on the ground of arbitration clause: Delhi HC
The Delhi High Court (“High Court”) in its recent judgment in Parasramka Holding Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Ambience Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.[1] held that formal application under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation
- Arbitration and Conciliation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy Code – Public Announcements
- Civil
- Commercial litigation
- Commercial/Corporate
- Criminal
- Cyber Law
- Debt Recovery
- Food
- IL News
- Infrastructure
- Insolvency & Bankruptcy
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property Rights
- International
- Labour
- Law
- Medico-Legal
- Negotiable Instrument
- NRI Laws
- Policy
- Power
- Real Estate
- Tax