Delhi High Court reiterates its findings on what constitutes non est filing for the purposes of calculating period of limitation.

Introduction The High Court of Delhi, in a recent judgement re-iterated the concept of non-est filing in Ambrosia Corner House Private Limited V. Hangro S Foods1. The Court laid out instances that would constitute non-est

Bombay High Court

Once the reference under MSMED Act is filed, it would override invocation of arbitration by other party: Bombay High court

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in a recent order passed on 24th January 2023 has ruled that the ongoing dispute filed under the provision of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act,

COMPLETION DATE AGREED BY THE PARTIES IN AGREEMENT FOR SALE IS ‘SACROSANCT’ –MAHARERA

In recent order dated 13th January 20231, Hon’ble MahaRERA reiterated and ruled that the completion date agreed by the parties mentioned while entering into the Agreement for Sale is sacrosanct. The said order was delivered

DISPUTES REGARDING NON-PAYMENT OF DUES CANNOT BE REFERRED TO ARBITRATION AS IT IS SIMPLY A CASE OF RECOVERY: PUNJAB AND HARYANA HC

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in a recent judgment1 held that when the dispute between the parties relates to a case of simpliciter non-payment of dues it cannot be said to

SUPREME COURT OBSERVES: BURDEN LIES ON THE BORROWER TO PROVE THAT THE SECURED PROPERTIES ARE AGRICULTURAL LANDS

The Supreme Court, comprising Justice M.R. Shah and Justice M.M. Sundaresh in a recent judgment1 held that the burden to prove that the secured properties are agricultural lands and are being used as agricultural lands

SARFAESI Act Prevails Over MSMED Act: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court’s Division Bench comprising of Justice M.R. Shah and Justice Krishna Murari in Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited vs Girnar Corrugators Pvt. Ltd1, vide judgment dated 05.01.2023, held that Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises

1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 77